Back to the Asylum: The Future of Mental Health Law and Policy in the United States

JAMA ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 270 (22) ◽  
pp. 2739
Author(s):  
M. Gregg Bloche
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Paul Bowen

In ‘Almost a Revolution: Mental Health Law and the Limits of Change’, Prof. Paul Applebaum, writing in 1994, describes a period of tumultuous change in the United States during the late 1960s in civil rights and mental health law and which lasted nearly three decades. At the end of that period, he concluded, there had been little real and substantial change to mental health law in the United States. This article looks at some of the changes to mental health law that have already been wrought in England & Wales by the Human Rights Act 1998 and briefly considers its potential for creating real and substantial change in the longer term.


1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Jan Brakel ◽  
James L. Cavanaugh

There have been substantial developments in mental health law in the United States over the last 10–15 years. One focal point has been the insanity defence, discussed here. The operational consequences of the legal changes remain to be assessed empirically, but informed speculation is possible. Both a description of the reforms and the assessment of their potential effect are relevant to members of the psychiatric profession in Australia, whether they be forensic specialists or traditional practitioners or researchers. Selective consideration of the American experience, as opposed to contemplating wholesale transposition, is the appropriate posture for Australian policymakers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document