scholarly journals Health Care–Associated Infection After Red Blood Cell Transfusion

JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 311 (13) ◽  
pp. 1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Rohde ◽  
Derek E. Dimcheff ◽  
Neil Blumberg ◽  
Sanjay Saint ◽  
Kenneth M. Langa ◽  
...  
JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 312 (19) ◽  
pp. 2041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merete Gregersen ◽  
Lars Carl Borris ◽  
Else Marie Damsgaard

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3817-3817 ◽  
Author(s):  
aleria Santini ◽  
Fabio Truschi ◽  
Antonella Bertelli

Abstract Abstract 3817 Background: For the majority of patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), anemia is the principal cause of symptoms. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion can alleviate fatigue, dyspnea, and cardiac problems in anemic pts. Approximately 80% of pts with MDS are anemic at the time of presentation and more than 40% require regular RBC transfusions at some stage of disease (Brechignac, Blood, 2004;A4716). Cost of blood products is one of the most uncontrollable items in the budget of MDS care. Aims: This study was performed to identify, measure, and assess the health care activities and resources needed to provide RBC transfusions, and to determine their costs. Methods: This cost analysis was performed from the perspective of health care providers, according to the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method (Asadi, J Soc Health Syst,1996). ABC systems focus on activities involved in the delivery of care. Under the ABC system, costs are first traced to activities and then traced from the activities to units of episodic care using cost drivers based on the consumption of activity resources (Udpa, Manag Care Q, 2001). This analysis was performed within Florence Italy's Local Health Authority (ASL 10; 813,419 members, 48% male, 2008), at OSMA Transfusion Center, with scientific support from the Hematology Unit of AOU Careggi University Hospital, Florence. All transfusions were performed in an outpatient ambulatory setting and no hospitalizations (for any cause) were considered in the analysis. A “self-reporting” approach (Burke, J Nurse Admin, 2000) was used to collect resource utilization data. According to the ABC method, the transfusion procedure was described in terms of episodes that encompass macro-activities and micro-activities (Casati, McGraw-Hill, 2002) and are represented in a process-flow diagram. All professionals involved in providing RBC transfusions participated in structured interviews and validated the flow chart generated to represent the process. Human, material, and capital resources were described, and their unitary costs provided by the OSMA Cost and Performance Management Office, for the year 2008. Episodes identified were: RBC donation, processing, and transfusion, each subdivided into macro-activities and micro-activities amenable to economic assessment. Macro-activities identified for donation included: admission, clinic visit, donation, and discharge; for processing: centrifugation, separation of blood elements, and storage; and for transfusion: pt admission, compatibility testing, distribution, transfusion, and waste management. Micro-activities were evaluated according to the professional who performed the task and the time and materials required. Unit costs were attributed to resources as follows: Results: The total average cost of the 3 episodes for RBC transfusion was |CE492.57, divided as follows: 1) donation: |CE116.02; 2) processing |CE233.29; 3) transfusion |CE135.16, and 4) overhead |CE8.10. Cost distribution is shown in the Table. The cost of a single RBC unit was |CE349.31. OSMA-Florence Transfusion Center managed 7,994 RBC units in 2008, from which the Hematology section performed an average of 23 transfusions per week (4.6 per day). Conclusion: RBC transfusion is an essential and life-saving intervention for anemic patients. The economic burden of transfusions comprises 2 dimensions: costs to perform transfusion and costs associated with management of transfusion-related risks (eg, iron overload, transmitted infections, adverse effects attributable to immune mechanisms) (Alessandrino, Blood, 2002). Our analysis quantitates costs for the first dimension, providing direct and indirect costs of RBC transfusion. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (60) ◽  
pp. 1-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnaby C Reeves ◽  
Katie Pike ◽  
Chris A Rogers ◽  
Rachel CM Brierley ◽  
Elizabeth A Stokes ◽  
...  

BackgroundUncertainty about optimal red blood cell transfusion thresholds in cardiac surgery is reflected in widely varying transfusion rates between surgeons and cardiac centres.ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that a restrictive compared with a liberal threshold for red blood cell transfusion after cardiac surgery reduces post-operative morbidity and health-care costs.DesignMulticentre, parallel randomised controlled trial and within-trial cost–utility analysis from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. We could not blind health-care staff but tried to blind participants. Random allocations were generated by computer and minimised by centre and operation.SettingSeventeen specialist cardiac surgery centres in UK NHS hospitals.ParticipantsPatients aged > 16 years undergoing non-emergency cardiac surgery with post-operative haemoglobin < 9 g/dl. Exclusion criteria were: unwilling to have transfusion owing to beliefs; platelet, red blood cell or clotting disorder; ongoing or recurrent sepsis; and critical limb ischaemia.InterventionsParticipants in the liberal group were eligible for transfusion immediately after randomisation (post-operative haemoglobin < 9 g/dl); participants in the restrictive group were eligible for transfusion if their post-operative haemoglobin fell to < 7.5 g/dl during the index hospital stay.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was a composite outcome of any serious infectious (sepsis or wound infection) or ischaemic event (permanent stroke, myocardial infarction, gut infarction or acute kidney injury) during the 3 months after randomisation. Events were verified or adjudicated by blinded personnel. Secondary outcomes included blood products transfused; infectious events; ischaemic events; quality of life (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions); duration of intensive care or high-dependency unit stay; duration of hospital stay; significant pulmonary morbidity; all-cause mortality; resource use, costs and cost-effectiveness.ResultsWe randomised 2007 participants between 15 July 2009 and 18 February 2013; four withdrew, leaving 1000 and 1003 in the restrictive and liberal groups, respectively. Transfusion rates after randomisation were 53.4% (534/1000) and 92.2% (925/1003). The primary outcome occurred in 35.1% (331/944) and 33.0% (317/962) of participants in the restrictive and liberal groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.34;p = 0.30], respectively. There were no subgroup effects for the primary outcome, although some sensitivity analyses substantially altered the estimated OR. There were no differences for secondary clinical outcomes except for mortality, with more deaths in the restrictive group (4.2%, 42/1000 vs. 2.6%, 26/1003; hazard ratio 1.64, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.67;p = 0.045). Serious post-operative complications excluding primary outcome events occurred in 35.7% (354/991) and 34.2% (339/991) of participants in the restrictive and liberal groups, respectively. The total cost per participant from surgery to 3 months postoperatively differed little by group, just £182 less (standard error £488) in the restrictive group, largely owing to the difference in red blood cells cost. In the base-case cost-effectiveness results, the point estimate suggested that the restrictive threshold was cost-effective; however, this result was very uncertain partly owing to the negligible difference in quality-adjusted life-years gained.ConclusionsA restrictive transfusion threshold is not superior to a liberal threshold after cardiac surgery. This finding supports restrictive transfusion due to reduced consumption and costs of red blood cells. However, secondary findings create uncertainty about recommending restrictive transfusion and prompt a new hypothesis that liberal transfusion may be superior after cardiac surgery. Reanalyses of existing trial datasets, excluding all participants who did not breach the liberal threshold, followed by a meta-analysis of the reanalysed results are the most obvious research steps to address the new hypothesis about the possible harm of red blood cell transfusion.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN70923932.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 60. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document