Nasal Dorsum Transposition Flap for Closure of an Alar Rim Defect

Author(s):  
Luciana Takata Pontes ◽  
Leonard H. Goldberg ◽  
Adam J. Mamelak ◽  
Arash Kimyai-Asadi
2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUCIANA TAKATA PONTES ◽  
LEONARD H. GOLDBERG ◽  
ADAM J. MAMELAK ◽  
ARASH KIMYAI-ASADI

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoon Rashid ◽  
Muhammad Zia ul Islam ◽  
Muhammad Sarmad Tamimy ◽  
Ehtesham ul Haq ◽  
Samina Aman ◽  
...  

Objective: To formulate a standardized procedure for repair of the nasal component of Tessier number 1 and 2 clefts. Patients and Methods: The procedure was performed from 1998 to 2007 in 13 patients with congenital nasal clefts of different degrees of expression corresponding to Tessier 1 and 2. The patients’ ages ranged from 3 months to 28 years. There were 10 male and three female patients. In the absence of any standard published technique for these rare defects, we devised our own method, which we find uniformly applicable to all such cases. We use a composite muco-chondro-cutaneous lateral alar flap to recreate the alar rim. The resulting defect on the lateral nasal wall is then covered with a transposition flap from the dorsum. An alar rim z-plasty was added in cases where notching was evident. Results: In all cases, no problem of flap viability was encountered and all healed well with minimal scarring. The postoperative results were satisfactory and have remained stable over an average 6-month follow-up period. Conclusions: We recommend this technique to be used for the correction of nasal deformity associated with Tessier clefts number 1 and 2. We feel that this technique is relatively simple and easily reproducible.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1229-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Knackstedt ◽  
Nathaniel J. Jellinek

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 045-052
Author(s):  
Mario Bazanelli Junqueira Ferraz ◽  
Guilherme Constante Preis Sella

AbstractNasal dorsal preservation surgery was described more than 100 years ago, but recently has gained prominence. Our objective is to show the surgical technique, the main indications and counterindications, and the complications. It is a technique that does not cause the detachment of the upper lateral cartilage (ULC) from the nasal septum, and has the main following sequence: preparation of the septum and its resection can be at different levels (high or low, i.e., SPAR [septum pyramidal adjustment and repositioning] A or B); preparation of the pyramid; transversal osteotomy; lateral osteotomy(s); and septopyramidal adjustment. The result is a nose with a lower radix than the original, a deprojection of the nasal dorsum tending to maintain its original shape; an increase in the interalar distance (IAD) and enlargement of the nasal middle ⅓; and loss of projection of the nasal tip and roundness of the nostrils. Thus, the ideal candidate is the one who benefits from such side effects, that is: tension nose, that is, high radix with projected dorsum, projected anterior nasal septal angle (ANSA), narrow middle ⅓, narrow IAD, thin nostrils and straight perpendicular plate of the ethmoid (PPE), and, depending on the characteristics, the deviated nose. The counterindications are low radix, irregularities in the nasal dorsum, ANSA lower than rhinion, and a wide middle ⅓. And the main stigmas are: a nose with a very low radix, middle ⅓ enlarged, residual hump, and saddling of the supratip area. Other issues of this technique are: the shape of the radix; the need or not to remove PPE; wide dorsum; irregular dorsum; ANSA lower than rhinion; weak cartilages; long nasal bone; deviated PPE; and obsessive patient. We conclude that this is a great technique for noses with characteristics suitable to it; care must be taken with the stigmas it can cause.


Author(s):  
Emrah Kağan Yaşar ◽  
Can İlker Demir ◽  
Buket Dursun ◽  
Murat Şahin Alagöz

Author(s):  
Hyoung-Jin Moon ◽  
Won Lee ◽  
Do Hyun Kim ◽  
Il Hwan Lee ◽  
Soo Whan Kim
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document