Market Risk and Non-Traded Market Risk (Interest-Rate Risk in the Banking Book)

2018 ◽  
pp. 970-1031
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Interest Rate Risk ◽  
Rate Risk

scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Syariah Bank Umum Syariah (BUS) dengan Unit Usaha Syariah (UUS) pada Bank Umum Konvensional

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Wiwin Kurniasari
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Interest Rate Risk ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Business Unit ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Rate Risk ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio

This study aims to analyze the comparative financial performance of Islamic Banking with Conventional Banking (Shariah Business Unit) for each financial ratio and overall. The measurements of banking performance were used in this study are CAMELS ratios (Capital, Asset, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity to Market Risk). This study uses 11 Shariah Banks and 12 Shariah Business Unit in 2012. This study shows that there are no differences between Shariah Banks and Shariah Business Unit in Capital Adequacy Ratio and Ratio Quality of Earning Asset, but there are differences in Management Ratio, Profitability Ratio, Liquidity Ratio, and Sensitivity Ratio in each and overall.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa perbandingan kinerja keuanganperbankan syariah yaitu Bank Umum Syari ah (BUS) dengan Bank Konvensional dari Unit Usaha Syariah (UUS) untuk masing-masing rasio keuangan dan secara keseluruhan. Ukuran kinerja bank yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah rasio keuangan bank CAMELS (Capital, Asset, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, sensitivity to market risk), yang meliputi Capital Adequacy Ratio (mewakili rasio permodalan), pembentukan penyisihan penghapusan aktiva produktif (mewakili rasio kualitas aktiva produktif), Net Profit Margin/NPM(mewakili rasio manajemen), Return on Assets (ROA), Loan to Deposit Ratio (mewakili rasio likuiditas) dan Interest Rate Risk Ratio (mewakili rasio Sensitivitas terhadap Risiko Pasar).Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah purposive sampling yang merupakan teknik pengambilan sampel dengan pertimbangan atau kriteria tertentu. Sampel yang dipergunakan peneliti adalah11 Bank Umum Syariah (BUS) dan 12 Unit Usaha Syariah (UUS) yang memiliki kelengkapan laporan keuangan tahun 2012 yang berupa neraca, laporan laba rugi, komitmen dan kontinjensi, kualitas aktiva produktif dan informasi lainnya, perhitungan kewajiban penyediaan modal minimum (KPMM). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, analisis uji beda rata-rata t-Test memperlihatkan tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara kinerja keuangan perbankan syariah pada Bank Umum Syariah (BUS) dengan perbankan konvensional yang mempunyai Unit Usaha Syariah (UUS) jika dilihat dari rasio permodalan (CAR) dan rasio kualitas aktiva produktif (PPAP). Ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara kinerja keuangan perbankan syariah (Bank Umum Syariah) dengan perbankan konvensional yang mempunyai Unit Usaha Syariah (UUS) jika dilihat dari rasio manajemen (NPM), rasio profitabilitas (ROA), rasio likuiditas (LDR), dan rasio sensitifitas terhadap reaksi pasar-Interest Rate Risk Ratio (IRRR), serta jika dilakukan analisis secara keseluruhan kinerja keuangan perbankan syariah.

Synthesis and Conclusion

2019 ◽  
pp. 443-458
Author(s):  
Alan N. Rechtschaffen
Keyword(s):  
Civil War ◽  
Interest Rate ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Interest Rate Risk ◽  
Securities And Exchange Commission ◽  
Confederate States Of America ◽  
Rate Risk ◽  
National Bank

This chapter begins with a synthesis of key themes, covering derivatives, debt instruments, and structured notes. It considers the case study Securities and Exchange Commission v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. & Fabrice Tourre. It then describes the Erlanger “cotton” bonds issued by the Confederate States of America to raise money during the Civil War. This is followed by discussions on range notes, internal leverage and market risk, and risks (interest rate risk, liquidity risk, reinvestment risk). The chapter concludes by describing the bulletin issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on May 22, 2002, to all national bank CEOs and all federal branches and agencies in regard to risky “yield-chasing” strategies that were returning to the markets.

scholarly journals Effect of operational and market risk exposures on financial performance of DT-Saccos in Kenya

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 107-118
Author(s):  
Sisimonda Kinya Mwanja
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Interest Rate Risk ◽  
Risk Exposure ◽  
Operating Efficiency ◽  
Operating Expense ◽  
Rate Risk ◽  
Exchange Risk

The main aim of the investigation was to analyze the effect of operational and market risk exposures on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya. The specific objectives of the study were to; assess the effect of operating expense risk exposure on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya; To establish the effect of operation efficiency risk exposure on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya; Effect of interest rate risk exposure on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya; Effect of foreign exchange rate risk exposure on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya. Effect of operational and market risk exposure on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya. The study used panel data between the years 2010-2019 which was 10 years period. The results revealed that at both bivariate and multivariate regression operating expense risk, operating efficiency and foreign exchange risk exposure had a significant effect on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya. Only interest rate risk exposure did not have a significant effect on the financial performance of DT-SACCOs in Kenya.

Behavioral analysis of long-term implied volatilities

2019 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Xu ◽  
Hong Xie ◽  
Yuehua Wu
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Implied Volatility ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Interest Rate Risk ◽  
Risk Capital ◽  
Time Segment ◽  
Underlying Asset ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Rate Risk

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze different behaviors between long-term options’ implied volatilities and realized volatilities. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a widely adopted short interest rate model that describes a stochastic process of the short interest rate to capture interest rate risk. Price a long-term option by a system of two stochastic processes to capture both underlying asset and interest rate volatilities. Model capital charges according to the Basel III regulatory specified approach. S&P 500 index and relevant data are used to illustrate how the proposed model works. Coup with the low interest rate scenario by first choosing an optimal time segment obtained by a multiple change-point detection method, and then using the data from the chosen time segment to estimate the CIR model parameters, and finally obtaining the final option price by incorporating the capital charge costs. Findings Monotonic increase in long-term option implied volatility can be explained mainly by interest rate risk, and the level of implied volatility can be explained by various valuation adjustments, particularly risk capital costs, which differ from existing published literatures that typically explained the differences in behaviors of long-term implied volatilities by the volatility of volatility or risk premium. The empirical results well explain long-term volatility behaviors. Research limitations/implications The authors only consider the market risk capital in this paper for demonstration purpose. Dealers may price the long-term options with the credit risk. It appears that other than the market risks such as underlying asset volatility and interest rate volatility, the market risk capital is a main nonmarket risk factor that significantly affects the long-term option prices. Practical implications Analysis helps readers and/or users of long-term options to understand why long-term option implied equity volatilities are much higher than observed. The framework offered in the paper provides some guidance if one would like to check if a long-term option is priced reasonable. Originality/value It is the first time to analyze mathematically long-term options’ volatility behavior in comparison with historically observed volatility.

Balance-sheet interest rate risk: a weighted Lp approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslaw Gajek ◽  
Elzbieta Krajewska
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rate ◽  
Balance Sheet ◽  
Interest Rate Risk ◽  
Rate Risk
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document