“Sundadonty” and the population history of Southeast Asia: A reply to Turner

2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Hudson ◽  
Hirofumi Matsumura
2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 962-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Walton ◽  
Jane M. Handley ◽  
Willoughby Tun-Lin† ◽  
Frank H. Collins ◽  
Ralph E. Harbach ◽  
...  

Nature ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 596 (7873) ◽  
pp. 543-547
Author(s):  
Selina Carlhoff ◽  
Akin Duli ◽  
Kathrin Nägele ◽  
Muhammad Nur ◽  
Laurits Skov ◽  
...  

AbstractMuch remains unknown about the population history of early modern humans in southeast Asia, where the archaeological record is sparse and the tropical climate is inimical to the preservation of ancient human DNA1. So far, only two low-coverage pre-Neolithic human genomes have been sequenced from this region. Both are from mainland Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherer sites: Pha Faen in Laos, dated to 7939–7751 calibrated years before present (yr cal bp; present taken as ad 1950), and Gua Cha in Malaysia (4.4–4.2 kyr cal bp)1. Here we report, to our knowledge, the first ancient human genome from Wallacea, the oceanic island zone between the Sunda Shelf (comprising mainland southeast Asia and the continental islands of western Indonesia) and Pleistocene Sahul (Australia–New Guinea). We extracted DNA from the petrous bone of a young female hunter-gatherer buried 7.3–7.2 kyr cal bp at the limestone cave of Leang Panninge2 in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Genetic analyses show that this pre-Neolithic forager, who is associated with the ‘Toalean’ technocomplex3,4, shares most genetic drift and morphological similarities with present-day Papuan and Indigenous Australian groups, yet represents a previously unknown divergent human lineage that branched off around the time of the split between these populations approximately 37,000 years ago5. We also describe Denisovan and deep Asian-related ancestries in the Leang Panninge genome, and infer their large-scale displacement from the region today.


2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Matsumura ◽  
Mark J. Hudson

1961 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. W. Small

It is generally accepted that history is an element of culture and the historian a member of society, thus, in Croce's aphorism, that the only true history is contemporary history. It follows from this that when there occur great changes in the contemporary scene, there must also be great changes in historiography, that the vision not merely of the present but also of the past must change.


1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-285
Author(s):  
Eilidh Garrett

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-336
Author(s):  
PIOTR DASZKIEWICZ ◽  
MICHEL JEGU

ABSTRACT: This paper discusses some correspondence between Robert Schomburgk (1804–1865) and Adolphe Brongniart (1801–1876). Four letters survive, containing information about the history of Schomburgk's collection of fishes and plants from British Guiana, and his herbarium specimens from Dominican Republic and southeast Asia. A study of these letters has enabled us to confirm that Schomburgk supplied the collection of fishes from Guiana now in the Laboratoire d'Ichtyologie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris. The letters of the German naturalist are an interesting source of information concerning the practice of sale and exchange of natural history collections in the nineteenth century in return for honours.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document