The clinician and the vascular laboratory in the diagnosis of aortoiliac stenosis

1984 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Campbell ◽  
S. E. A. Cole ◽  
R. Skidmore ◽  
R. N. Baird
2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Zwolak
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Lee ◽  
Courtney Webb ◽  
Mark W. Fugate

Abdominal aortic disease affects more than 3 million people per year. For vascular sonographers, imaging aortic disease can become routine. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the knowledge that we have of aortic disease, diagnosis, and treatment. We present 4 cases with new or worsening conditions diagnosed by duplex ultrasound (DUS). Our first case is a 79-year-old woman returning for surveillance of an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The DUS findings reveal an increasing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac, with evidence of flow originating from an incomplete seal at the attachment suggesting type I endoleak. Next, is a 56-year-old man returning 1 month after type A dissection repair, now presenting with unilateral claudication. The DUS findings of the left lower extremity demonstrated an early systolic deceleration waveform, suggesting more proximal disease. Upon further imaging, an abdominal aortic dissection was identified terminating into the left internal iliac artery, causing the true lumen to be compressed. The third case was a 75-year-old man returning for follow-up of an EVAR and iliac repair. The DUS findings show an increase in iliac artery sac size and anechoic area that was filled with color Doppler flow. These findings are suggestive of type I endoleak involving the distal attachment. The last case is a 56-year-old man returning for EVAR and iliac artery repair surveillance. The common iliac artery aneurysm sac had increased in diameter and length. The distal attachment of the left iliac extension cuff terminated within the aneurysm sac, causing a type I endoleak. Accurate DUS diagnosis of aortic disease is crucial for patient care. Meticulous analysis of the vessels and surrounding structures can make a difference in diagnostic outcomes. Vascular sonographers should continually review and revise vascular laboratory protocols to increase their diagnostic accuracy and improve patient care. It is important to extend the vascular laboratory protocols when complex cases arise to better demonstrate complicated diagnoses and challenging anatomy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana I. Casanegra ◽  
Susan M. Whitelaw ◽  
Roy K. Greenberg ◽  
Vikram Kashyap ◽  
Heather L. Gornik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document