scholarly journals PROTOCOL: Technology‐based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A meta‐analysis and systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuka Emezue ◽  
Tina L. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Digital Interventions

scholarly journals Meta-analysis and systematic review for the treatment of perpetrators of intimate partner violence

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 220-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günnur Karakurt ◽  
Esin Koç ◽  
Ezgi Elif Çetinsaya ◽  
Zozan Ayluçtarhan ◽  
Shari Bolen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner

scholarly journals Predictive value of indicators for identifying child maltreatment and intimate partner violence in coded electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
Shabeer Syed ◽  
Rachel Ashwick ◽  
Marco Schlosser ◽  
Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo ◽  
Leah Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Child Maltreatment ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Electronic Health

ObjectiveElectronic health records (EHRs) are routinely used to identify family violence, yet reliable evidence of their validity remains limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the positive predictive values (PPVs) of coded indicators in EHRs for identifying intimate partner violence (IPV) and child maltreatment (CM), including prenatal neglect.MethodsWe searched 18 electronic databases between January 1980 and May 2020 for studies comparing any coded indicator of IPV or CM including prenatal neglect defined as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) or fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), against an independent reference standard. We pooled PPVs for each indicator using random effects meta-analyses.ResultsWe included 88 studies (3 875 183 individuals) involving 15 indicators for identifying CM in the prenatal period and childhood (0–18 years) and five indicators for IPV among women of reproductive age (12–50 years). Based on the International Classification of Disease system, the pooled PPV was over 80% for NAS (16 studies) but lower for FAS (<40%; seven studies). For young children, primary diagnoses of CM, specific injury presentations (eg, rib fractures and retinal haemorrhages) and assaults showed a high PPV for CM (pooled PPVs: 55.9%–87.8%). Indicators of IPV in women had a high PPV, with primary diagnoses correctly identifying IPV in >85% of cases.ConclusionsCoded indicators in EHRs have a high likelihood of correctly classifying types of CM and IPV across the life course, providing a useful tool for assessment, support and monitoring of high-risk groups in health services and research.

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Against HIV-Positive Women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 152483802090656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Y. Tenkorang ◽  
Michael Asamoah-Boaheng ◽  
Adobea Y. Owusu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Hiv Positive Women ◽  
Sub Saharan

Objectives: To systematically analyze and summarize the literature on intimate partner violence (IPV) against HIV-positive women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and to identify their risk factors for IPV. Method: A comprehensive review of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) yielded 1,879 articles (PubMed = 1,251, Embase = 491, Web of Science = 132, and identified additional records = 5). Twenty were selected for quantitative and qualitative assessment and synthesis. We employed a random effects model with generic inverse variance method and estimated the odds ratios. Findings: Results indicated a high prevalence of physical, sexual, and emotional violence against women living with HIV/AIDS in SSA. Educational background, alcohol use, marital status, previous experiences with IPV, and employment status were identified as significant risk factors. We also assessed the methodological quality of the articles by examining publication bias and some heterogeneity statistics. Conclusion: There is limited research on IPV against HIV-positive women in SSA. However, the few existing studies agree on the importance of targeting HIV-positive women with specific interventions given their vulnerability to IPV and to address factors exacerbating these risks and vulnerabilities.

scholarly journals Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 18845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Caitlin M Marshall ◽  
Hilary C Rees ◽  
Annabelle Nunez ◽  
Echezona E Ezeanolue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner

scholarly journals Couples Therapy for Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnur Karakurt ◽  
Kathleen Whiting ◽  
Chantal van Esch ◽  
Shari D. Bolen ◽  
Joseph R. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Couples Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner

scholarly journals Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e034153
Author(s):  
Anne Katrine Normann ◽  
Aleksandra Bakiewicz ◽  
Frederikke Kjerulff Madsen ◽  
Khalid Saeed Khan ◽  
Vibeke Rasch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Exclusive Breastfeeding ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Breastfeeding Duration ◽  
Breastfeeding Initiation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Library Studies

ObjectiveThe association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and breastfeeding is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to summarise the evidence of breastfeeding outcomes following exposure to IPV.DesignSystematic review.MethodsWe searched for published studies without study design or language restrictions (up to July 2019) in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS and The Global Health Library. Studies assessing various breastfeeding outcomes (initiation, duration and exclusive breastfeeding) in women exposed to IPV in any form (physical, psychological or sexual) and at any stage (1 year pre-pregnancy, during or post-pregnancy) were included. Two authors independently selected the studies and conducted the quality appraisal by use of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results were summarised taking precision and quality into account.ResultsA total of 16 studies (participants n=414 393) were included and they adjusted for a total of 48 different confounders. The majority of studies were cross-sectional (n=11) and most studies were judged to be fair/low quality. Four out of seven studies found that IPV exposure shortened breastfeeding duration (adjusted ORs/aORs=0.22 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85), 1.18 (95% CI: 1.01–1.37), 5.92 (95% CI: 1.72–27.98), 1.28 (95% CI: 1.18–1.39)). Further, 5/10 studies found that IPV led to early termination of exclusive breastfeeding (aORs=1.53 (95% CI: 1.01–23.1), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71–0.96), 1.35 (95% CI: 1.07–1.71), 0.17 (95% CI: 0.07–0.4), 1839 (95% CI: 1.61–2911)) and 2/6 studies found that IPV significantly reduced breastfeeding initiation (aORs=2.00 (95% CI: 1.2–3.3), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.7–0.93)).ConclusionIPV exposure appears to associate negatively with some breastfeeding outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis is required to quantify the magnitude of the association for specific IPV-outcome combinations. More high-quality studies and definition of core confounders are warranted.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019129353.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document