Identifying cutoff scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck cancer-specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 representing unmet supportive care needs in patients with head and neck cancer

Head & Neck ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (S1) ◽  
pp. E1493-E1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Femke Jansen ◽  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
C. René Leemans ◽  
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Cutoff Scores ◽  
Eortc Qlq

scholarly journals Burden and happiness in head and neck cancer carers: the role of supportive care needs

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 4283-4291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hanly ◽  
Rebecca Maguire ◽  
Myles Balfe ◽  
Philip Hyland ◽  
Aileen Timmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs

Perceived unmet supportive care needs and determinants of quality of life among head and neck cancer survivors: a research protocol

2013 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 2750-2758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie K.W. So ◽  
K.C. Choi ◽  
Carmen W.H. Chan ◽  
Winnie P.Y. Tang ◽  
Alice W.Y. Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Research Protocol ◽  
Care Needs

A Mixed-Methods Study of Unmet Supportive Care Needs Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnie K.W. So ◽  
Cho-Lee Wong ◽  
Kai-Chow Choi ◽  
Carmen W.H. Chan ◽  
Joanne C.Y. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs

Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) and the Head and Neck Cancer-specific Supportive Care Needs (SCNS-HNC) module

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxia LYU ◽  
Li Yin ◽  
Ping Cheng ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Shanshan Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs

Abstract Background: This study aimed to translate the English version of the supportive care needs scale of head and neck cancer patients (SCNS-HNC) questionnaire into Mandarin and to test the reliability and validity of the SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-HNC module in head and neck cancer patients. Methods: The Mandarin version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) and SCNS-HNC scales were used to assess 206 patients with head and neck cancer in Chengdu, China. Among them, 51 patients were re-tested 2 or 3 days after the first survey. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the retest reliability of the scale was evaluated by retest correlation coefficient r, the structural validity of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, and the ceiling and floor effects of the scale were evaluated. Results: The Mandarin version of the SCNS-HNC had Cronbach's alpha coefficients greater than 0.700 (0.737 ≤ 0.962) for all of the domains. Except for the psychological demand dimension (r=0.674) of the SCNS-SF34 scale, the retest reliability of the other domains was greater than 0.8. Three common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.39%. Conclusions: The Mandarin version of the SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-HNC demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and is able to measure the supportive care needs of Chinese patients with head and neck cancer.

The unmet supportive care needs of long-term head and neck cancer caregivers in the extended survivorship period

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1576-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Balfe ◽  
Katie O'Brien ◽  
Aileen Timmons ◽  
Phyllis Butow ◽  
Eleanor O' Sullivan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Cancer Caregivers

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the mandarin version of the supportive care needs survey short-form (SCNS-SF34) and the head and neck cancer-specific supportive care needs (SCNS-HNC) module

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxia Lyu ◽  
Li Yin ◽  
Ping Cheng ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Shanshan Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs

Abstract Background This study aimed to translate the English version of the supportive care needs scale of head and neck cancer patients (SCNS-HNC) questionnaire into Mandarin and to test the reliability and validity of the SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-HNC module in head and neck cancer patients. Methods The Mandarin version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) and SCNS-HNC scales were used to assess 206 patients with head and neck cancer in Chengdu, China. Among them, 51 patients were re-tested 2 or 3 days after the first survey. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, the retest reliability of the scale was evaluated by retest correlation coefficient r, the structural validity of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, and the ceiling and floor effects of the scale were evaluated. Results The Mandarin version of the SCNS-HNC had Cronbach’s alpha coefficients greater than 0.700 (0.737 ≤ 0.962) for all of the domains. Except for the psychological demand dimension (r = 0.674) of the SCNS-SF34 scale, the retest reliability of the other domains was greater than 0.8. Three common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.39%. Conclusions The Mandarin version of the SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-HNC demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and is able to measure the supportive care needs of Chinese patients with head and neck cancer. Trial registration ChiCTR, ChiCTR1900026635. Registered 16 October 2019- Retrospectively registered.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of Mandarin (Simplified) version of Head and Neck Cancer-specific Supportive Care Needs (SCNS-HNC) scale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxia LYU ◽  
Li Yin ◽  
Ping Cheng ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Shanshan Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
English Version ◽  
Care Needs

Abstract Background To translate the English version of supportive care needs scale of head and neck cancer patients (SCNS-HNC) questionnaire into Mandarin (Simplified), and to test reliability and validity. Methods The With authorization of the English version scale were obtained from Professor Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw who worked at VU University Medical Center of Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), in the Netherlands. The Mandarin (Simplified) version of the SCNS-HNC scale was developed by translation, back-translation and cultural adaptation. The Mandarin (Simplified) version of Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) and SCNS-HNC scales were used to measure 206 patients with head and neck cancer in a upper first-class hospital in Chengdu. Among them, 51 patients were re-tested 2 or 3 days after the first survey. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the retest reliability of the scale was evaluated by retest correlation coefficient r, the structural validity of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, and the ceiling and floor effects of the scale were evaluated. Item-domain correlation analysis was used to evaluate the collective validity and differential validity of the scale. Results The Mandarin (Simplified) version of SCNS-HNC had Cronbach's alpha coefficients of more than 0.700 (0.737 ≤ 0.962)for the all of the domians. Except for the psychological demand dimension of SCNS-SF34 scale, the retest reliability in other fields was more than 0.8. Three common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.39%. The correlation coefficient of all items in Mandarin (Simplified) version of SCNS-SF34and SCNS-HNC with their own domians were higher than those with otherdomians. Conclusion The Mandarin (Simplified) of SCNS-HNC demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity, which is available for measurement of the supportive care needs of Chinese patients with head and neck cancer.Clinical registration number: ChiCTR1900026635

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Head and Neck Cancer-specific Supportive Care Needs (SCNS-HNC) scale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxia LYU ◽  
Li Yin ◽  
Ping Cheng ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Shanshan Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analysis ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: This study aimed to translate the English version of the supportive care needs scale of head and neck cancer patients (SCNS-HNC) questionnaire into Mandarin and to test its reliability and validity.Methods: The Mandarin version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) and SCNS-HNC scales were used to assess 206 patients with head and neck cancer in Chengdu, China. Among them, 51 patients were re-tested 2 or 3 days after the first survey. The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the retest reliability of the scale was evaluated by retest correlation coefficient r, the structural validity of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, and the ceiling and floor effects of the scale were evaluated.Results: The Mandarin version of the SCNS-HNC had Cronbach's alpha coefficients greater than 0.700 (0.737 ≤ 0.962) for all of the domains. Except for the psychological demand dimension (r=0.674) of the SCNS-SF34 scale, the retest reliability of the other domains was greater than 0.8. Three common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.39%. Conclusions: The Mandarin version of the SCNS-HNC demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and is able to measure the supportive care needs of Chinese patients with head and neck cancer.Clinical registration number: ChiCTR1900026635

Supportive Care Needs of Chinese Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. S32
Author(s):  
W.K.W. So ◽  
C.L. Wong ◽  
K.C. Choi ◽  
C.W.H. Chan ◽  
J.C.Y. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs

Immediate post-treatment supportive care needs of patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 5557-5567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Henry ◽  
Ali Alias ◽  
Maria Cherba ◽  
Claudia Woronko ◽  
Zeev Rosberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Supportive Care Needs ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Care Needs
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document