Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in head and neck cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Head & Neck ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1091-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco A. Mascarella ◽  
Erin Mannard ◽  
Sabrina Daniela Silva ◽  
Anthony Zeitouni
Head & Neck ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2546-2557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan Tham ◽  
Yonatan Bardash ◽  
Saori Wendy Herman ◽  
Peter David Costantino

Author(s):  
Daniel Jan Toneatti ◽  
Ronny Roger Graf ◽  
John-Patrik Burkhard ◽  
Benoît Schaller

Abstract Objectives This systematic review assesses dental implant survival, calculates the incidence rate of osteoradionecrosis, and evaluates risk factors in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Materials and methods Various databases (e.g., Medline/Embase using Ovid) and gray literature platforms were searched using a combination of keywords and subject headings. When appropriate, meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Otherwise, pooled analysis was applied. Results A total of 425 of the 660 included patients received radiotherapy. In total, 2602 dental implants were placed, and 1637 were placed in irradiated patients. Implant survival after an average follow-up of 37.7 months was 97% (5% confidence interval, CI 95.2%, 95% CI 98.3%) in nonirradiated patients and 91.9% (5% CI 87.7%, 95% CI: 95.3%) after an average follow-up of 39.8 months in irradiated patients. Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 11 cases, leading to an incidence of 3% (5% CI 1.6%, 95% CI 4.9%). The main factors impacting implant survival were radiation and grafting status, while factors influencing osteoradionecrosis could not be determined using meta-analysis. Conclusion Our data show that implant survival in irradiated patients is lower than in nonirradiated patients, and osteoradionecrosis is—while rare—a serious complication that any OMF surgeon should be prepared for. The key to success could be a standardized patient selection and therapy to improve the standard of care, reduce risks and shorten treatment time. Clinical relevance Our analysis provides further evidence that implant placement is a feasible treatment option in irradiated head and neck cancer patients with diminished oral function and good long-term cancer prognosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 665-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonatan Bardash ◽  
Caitlin Olson ◽  
Wendy Herman ◽  
Julian Khaymovich ◽  
Peter Costantino ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukinori Takenaka ◽  
Ryohei Oya ◽  
Takahiro Kitamiura ◽  
Naoki Ashida ◽  
Kotaro Shimizu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Raquel Pacheco ◽  
Maria Alzira Cavacas ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
Pedro Oliveira ◽  
Carlos Zagalo

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the literature about the incidence of oral mucositis and its degrees (mild, moderate, and severe), in patients undergoing head and neck cancer treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery). Addressing this issue is important since oral mucositis has a negative impact on oral health and significantly deteriorates the quality of life. Therefore, a multidisciplinary team, including dentists, should be involved in the treatment. The overall oral mucositis incidence was 89.4%. The global incidence for mild, moderate, and severe degrees were 16.8%, 34.5%, and 26.4%, respectively. The high incidence rates reported in this review point out the need for greater care in terms of the oral health of these patients.


Head & Neck ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 1122-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oisín Bugter ◽  
Steffi E. M. van de Ven ◽  
Jose A. Hardillo ◽  
Marco J. Bruno ◽  
Arjun D. Koch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document