Bone Infarct Associated Osteosarcoma: Epidemiologic and Survival Trends

Background Bone tumors are not a frequent occurrence and bone-infarct-associated sarcomas are even rarer. The prognosis of this disease is poor and its treatment remains a challenge. Nevertheless, hardly any analyses in literature report on secondary osteosarcoma (SO) on bone infarct and most of the data available do not provide sufficient details. We evaluated whether this condition could be further characterized and if prognosis could be influenced by the chemotherapy treatment. In particular, we sought to determine (1) the main features of this rare disease; (2) the overall survival (OS) rate; (3) the OS rate associated to chemotherapy treatment; (4) the correspondence between our results and published data in terms of survival. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients admitted at Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute of Bologna between 1992 and 2018 (1465 total cases of osteosarcoma). We identified a list of 11 cases of SO on bone infarct (cohort 1). We conferred about the epidemiology, surgical and chemotherapy (ChT) treatment and surveillance of infarct-associated osteosarcoma showing the correlation to data present in literature, corresponding to 15 case reports published within 1962-2018 (cohort 2). Results (1) cohort 1 was made of 11 patients: six females and five males, median age was 55 years. Nine (81%) were grade 4, two (19%) grade 3. Tumor predominantly arise on distal femur (64%). Most of patients had localized osteosarcoma at the diagnosis (81%); resection surgery was the elective treatment (73%) followed by amputation (18%). Of 11 patients, seven received also ChT (64%). (2) Five-years OS was 62% (95% CI: 28-84). Median OS was 74 months (95% CI: 12-not reached). The cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths (CICRD) was 37.7% (95% CI: 11.4-64.5) at 120 months. (3) In the group treated with only surgery OS was 50% at 5 years. For patients treated with any form of ChT, OS was 71% at 5 years (p=0.4773) and hazard ratio (HR) 0.56. The CICRD was 29% (at 2 years of follow-up. Instead, it was of 50% for patients treated only with surgery. (4) Median survival was 74 months and 19 months for cohort 1 and cohort 2 respectively (p=0.09). Data analysis showed a decreased HR for cohort 1 compared to cohort 2 (HR 0.378). Results confirmed also stratifying for age and ChT administration (HR 0.355). Conclusions Based on this work, our opinion is that the choice to undergo the patients to ChT combined to surgery could improve their prognosis.

Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation: A Multicenter Study

Introduction: A significant proportion of cervical cancer (CC) patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced CC. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after CCRT is controversial. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of AC after CCRT in stage III CC patients. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 139 FIGO stage III CC patients treated with CCRT of whom 45.3% received AC. Our goal was to determine the impact of AC on survival in these patients. Results: Five-year progression-free survival was 37.5% and 16% in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively (p=0.008). Median PFS was 30.9 months (CI 95 %14.8-46.9) and 16.6 months (CI 95% 9.3-23.9) in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 78.2% and 28.4% in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively (p<0.001). Median OS was 132.2 months (CI 95, %66.5-197.8) and 34.9 months (CI 95% 23.1-46.7) in patients receiving CCRT with and in without AC, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that AC provides OS and PFS benefit in stage III CC patients. Larger studies are needed to identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from AC.

Preliminary Clinical Validation of a Filtration-Based CTC Assay for Tumor Burden and HER2 Status Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Bearing multidimensional tumor-relevant information ranging from genomic alterations to proteomic makeup, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) constitute a promising material for liquid biopsy. The clinical validity of CTCs has been most extensively studied in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The Cellsearch assay is currently the most widely used, while alternative strategies are pursued. A filtration-based microfluidic device has been described for CTC enrichment, but its clinical relevance remains unknown. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this preliminary study, we prospectively enrolled 47 MBC patients and evaluated the performance of the abovementioned CTC assay for tumor burden monitoring and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status determination. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At baseline, 51.1% patients (24/47) were CTC positive. CTC count and positivity were also significantly higher in samples that accompanied poorer radiographic response evaluations. Serial blood draws suggested that CTC count enabled more accurate monitoring of tumor burden than serum markers carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 15-3. Also, in contrast to previous reports, CTC-HER2 status was moderately consistent with tumor-HER2 status. CTC-HER2 status assessment was further supported by <i>HER2</i> copy number measurements in select samples. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The preliminary results from this study suggest promise for the interrogated CDC assay in several aspects, including sensitive CTC detection, accurate disease status reflection, and HER2 status determination. More studies are warranted to validate these findings and further characterize the value of CTC assay.

Risk and Prognosis of Subsequent Primary Gastric Cancer

Introduction: The incidence and prognostic impact of subsequent primary gastric cancer (GC) in a population of other cancer survivors is unclear. We aimed to evaluate susceptibility to subsequent primary GC in cancer survivors and prognosis of GC with prior cancer history. Methods: 2,211 and 23,416 GC cases with and without prior cancer history were retrospectively selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Potential risk of developing subsequent primary GC was assessed through standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Cox regression were adopted to analyze the influence of prior cancer history and clinical characteristic factors on the prognosis of subsequent primary GC. A nomogram was established to predict overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to eliminate possible bias. Results: Compared with general population, cancer survivors had an increased risk of subsequent primary GC (SIR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.20, P<0.05). Prior cancer history was related to poor OS of GC [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19, P<0.001], but not cancer-specific survival (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.05, P=0.441). In addition, age, grade, stage, year of diagnosis, surgery, TNM stage and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for OS in GC cases with prior cancers. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.74), and calibrate curves showed good agreement between prediction by the nomogram and actual observation. Conclusions: Cancer survivors with increased risk of developing subsequent primary GC should strengthen their monitoring and follow-up to prevent occurrence of subsequent primary gastric cancer.

The Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Background: Breast cancer is still the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Once metastasized, breast cancer treatment primarily aims at reducing symptom burden, thereby trying to maintain and improve a patient´s quality of life (QoL), delaying disease progression, and prolonging survival. Curing the disease is not possible in the palliative setting. To better understand metastatic breast cancer patients, their symptoms and wishes, which are important for treatment-decision making and outcome, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are of great importance, giving an impression of what really matters to and concerns a patient. Summary: Many advances have been made to implicate PROs in clinical trials, non-interventional studies, registries, and clinical routine care of metastatic breast cancer. For example, large phase III trials like PALOMA-3 (NCT01942135), MONALEESA-7 (NCT02278120), HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794), and KEYNOTE-119 (NCT02555657) trials implemented PROs in their trial design to assess the QoL of their trial patients. Also, non-interventional studies on metastatic breast cancer, like e.g., the NABUCCO study (IOM-02240), and prospective non-interventional, multicenter registries e.g., the tumor registry breast cancer (NCT01351584) or the breast cancer registry platform OPAL (NCT03417115), have implemented PROs to assess QoL during the anti-cancer treatment periods of the patients. Key Message: Using PROs in metastatic breast cancer can support shared treatment-decision making and management of symptoms, eventually leading to an improvement in QoL. Progressively, regulatory authorities take PROs into consideration for the approval of new drugs. Hence, the implication of PROs in cancer treatment, and especially in MBC, is of significant value.

Next Generation Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA Can Optimize Second Line Treatment in RAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer after Progression on Anti-EGFR Therapy: Time to Rethink Our Approach

Background Management of Raswild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients upon disease progression after the successful use of targeted treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and backbone chemotherapy remains a clinical challenge. Development of treatment resistance with prevalence of pre-existing RAS mutated clones, RAS mutation conversion, truncation of extracellular receptor domains as well as HER2 and MET amplification are molecular events that can be difficult to follow without the use of sophisticated laboratory techniques. Summary The clinical hurdle of re-biopsy and tumor heterogeneity can be overcome by the implementation Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and identify drugable mutations or recovery of RAS-wildness. In this opinion paper we summarize with critical thinking the clinical approach to be followed after the failure of first line treatment in Ras wild-type CRC tumors with the use of NGS. Key Messages Rechallenge with anti-EGFR inhibitors, in case of persistent or recovery of Ras wildness, and targeted approach of specific mutations (BRAF inhibitors) amplifications (anti-Her2 treatment) or fusion proteins (NTRK inhibitors) can by guided by the use of NGS. The use of NGS platforms for serial analysis of ctDNA is an important step to better understand the molecular landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer and guide clinical decisions. NGS should be considered a mainstay in clinical practice for the management of CRC patients and health authorities should consider reimbursing its use in the appropriate clinical settings.

The Preventive Effects of Boron-Based Gel on Radiation Dermatitis in Patients Being Treated for Breast Cancer: A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a side effect of radiation therapy (RT) which is experienced by over 90% of patients being treated for breast cancer. The current clinical trial was conducted to measure the preventative effects of a boron-based gel on several different clinical outcomes (dermatitis, erythema, dry desquamation, and moist desquamation) after 25 radiotherapy sessions. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This research used a double-blind parallel-group design with a placebo control (<i>n</i> = 76) and randomized group (<i>n</i> = 181), with all participants being between 18 and 75 years old. Fifteen minutes before each radiotherapy, participants in the intervention group were given a gel containing 3% sodium pentaborate pentahydrate, while those in the placebo group received a gel with no chemical substance. Dermatitis, erythema, dry desquamation, and moist desquamation were compared between the 2 groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05), except for body mass index. After 14 days of treatment, dermatitis (98.7% vs. 9.9%; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), erythema (96.1% vs. 12.2%; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), dry desquamation (50% vs. 3.9%; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), and moist desquamation (18.4% vs. 0.6%; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) were much more common in the placebo group than the intervention group. To prevent dermatitis, erythema, dry desquamation, and moist desquamation in 1 patient, on average, 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–1.2), 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1–1.3), 2.2 (95% CI: 1.7–2.9), and 5.6 (95% CI: 3.8–11.0) patients need to be treated, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The boron-based gel has a significant preventive effect on several categories of RD which might be used by clinicians in breast cancer.

Anticoagulation Practice in Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Insights from GeCAT, a German Prospective Registry Study

Introduction: Cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) is a common and serious complication of active malignancies, increasing in frequency during systemic treatment and radiotherapy. Due to a high risk of recurrence and bleeding, the administration of anticoagulants for initial treatment and secondary prevention of CAT is challenging. We conducted a prospective registry study of patients with acute CAT to evaluate the way treatment is given to these patients in routine practice. Methods: From May 2015 to May 2017, all consecutive patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) admitted to specialty or emergency departments of the participating hospitals in Berlin, Germany, were entered in the registry. Patients with cancer underwent extensive baseline evaluation including the type and location of thrombosis and use of anticoagulant therapy. Follow-up assessments were made at discharge and by telephone interviews at 3 and 6 months. Results: A total of 382 patients with acute CAT were enrolled in the study, representing 24.5% of all patients with thrombosis. 70.4% of CAT patients had deep vein thromboses (DVT), 48.2% had pulmonary embolism (PE), and 18.6% had concurrent PE and DVT. A significant proportion of VTE (27%) were asymptomatic and were diagnosed only incidentally. At baseline, 97.9% of the patients received anticoagulant therapy, predominantly with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (n=334, 87.4%). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were given to 5.8% of patients, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were rarely used (<2% of patients). Changes in the prescription of antithrombotic agents were seen at discharge from hospital and during follow-up. Overall, the use of LMWH declined during follow-up, while the proportion of patients treated with DOACs increased to 32.4% at 6 months. At baseline, the most frequently used LMWH were enoxaparin and nadroparin, but many patients were switched to once daily tinzaparin prior to discharge. Initially and after discharge the majority of patients were treated by oncologists. Overall, 263 (68.8%) and 222 (58,1%) patients were still alive and could be contacted at 3 and 6 months of follow-up, respectively. Of these, 84.0% and 71.6% were still on anticoagulant therapy (58.6% and 36.5% on LMWH). Conclusion: In accordance with the guidelines, the majority of CAT patients received anticoagulation therapy for the recommended minimum duration of 3-6 months. LMWH remained the preferred option throughout the study, demonstrating good patient adherence. In deviation from guideline recommendations and available study results during the study period, more than a quarter of CAT patients were treated with DOACs. Only recently, DOACs have been established as another option for anticoagulation in CAT patients.

Antibody-Drug-Conjugates for Breast Cancer

Background Despite the advances that have been made to improve conventional chemotherapies, their use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window based on off-target toxicities. Antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) are composed of an antibody and a toxic payload covalently coupled by a chemical linker. They constitute an elegant means to tackle the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics by selectively delivering a highly toxic payload directly to target cells and thereby increasing efficacy of the delivered cytotoxic but at the same time limiting systemic exposure and toxicities. As such they appear inspired by Paul Ehrlich´s concept of a “magic bullet”, which he envisioned as drugs that go directly to their target to attack pathogens but remain harmless in healthy tissues. Summary The concept of conjugating drugs to antibodies via chemical linkers is not new. As early as in the 1960s researchers started to investigate such ADCs in animal models and first clinical trials based on mouse antibodies began in the 1980s. Although the concept appears relatively straightforward, ADCs are highly complex molecules, and it took several decades of research and development until the first ADC became approved by the FDA in 2000 and the second followed not until 11 years later. The development of an effective ADC is highly demanding, and each individual component of an ADC must be optimized: the target, the antibody, the linker and its conjugation chemistry as well as the cytotoxic payload. Today there are 9 approved ADCs overall and 3 for breast cancer. So, the pace of development seems to pick up with over 100 candidates in various stages of clinical development. Many ADCs of the newest generation are optimized to elicit a so-called bystander effect, to increase efficacy and tackle heterogneous antigen expression. This approach requires a balancing of efficacy and systemic toxicity. Hence, ADCs based on their complex biology cause relevant toxicities, which are characteristic for each specific compound and may include hematologic toxicities, elevated transaminases, gastrointestinal events, pneumonitis but also ocular toxicities as well as others many physicians may initially not be very familiar with. Management of the side effects will be key to the successful clinical use of these potent drugs. Key Messages This review focusses on the clinical experience with ADCs approved in breast cancer as well as promising candidates in late-stage clinical development. We will discuss the mode of action, biology, and composition of ADCs and how each of these crucial components influences their properties and efficacy.

Quality of Life of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Cetuximab, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin Comparing to Cetuximab, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin and Docetaxel within the CEFCID Trial

Introduction: CeFCiD was a multicenter phase II study comparing the efficacy of cetuximab, 5-flourouracil, cisplatin with the same regimen adding docetaxel in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. The primary analysis trial did not demonstrate survival benefit from therapy intensification in first-line recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The current analysis of the trial assessed the impact of treatment on quality of life (QoL). Methods: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the tumor specific module for head and neck cancer (QLQ-H&N35) were used to assess QoL at baseline (visit 1), after 2 (visit 3), 4 (visit 5), and 6 (visit 7) cycles of chemotherapy. Results: Of 180 patients included in this study, 86 patients (47.8%) completed the questionnaires at baseline. Considering selected scores over treatment time, there was no difference in global quality of life, dyspnea, swallowing and speech between the treatment arms in the course. For fatigue a significant increase from baseline to visit 3 (p=0.02), visit 5 (p=0.002), and to visit 7 (p=0.003) was observed for patients receiving docetaxel (D), cisplatin or carboplatin (P), 5-FU (F) and cetuximab (C). At the end of chemotherapy the manifestation of fatigue was similar compared in the two treatment arms. Discussion/Conclusion: Therapy intensification not adversely affect selected scores of QoL of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. Nevertheless, fatigue seems to be pronounced in patients treated with docetaxel.