scholarly journals Guidelines for external fixation frame rigidity and stresses

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Huiskes ◽  
E. Y. S. Chao
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.26) ◽  
pp. 190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Fatin Izzati Ibrahim ◽  
Ruslizam Daud ◽  
Muhammad Khairul Ali Hassan ◽  
Noor Ali Hassan ◽  
Noor Alia Md Zain ◽  
...  

Axial stiffness is the most important factor in stability. It is known that any changes in the diameter of any components of the frame will either increase or decrease the axial stiffness of the fixation. The model of implant and bone will be variety as the variables changes. Current studies states that ring stability are one of the most important factors in ensuring fractured bones to have a successful re-union. In circular external fixation, the stability of the pin-bone interaction is influenced by the stability of the fixation frame where the major component is the rings. The objective is to study the finite element analysis (FEA) of the external fixator assembled in human diaphysis under compression force with different materials of the exoskeleton which are stainless steel, titanium alloy, magnesium alloy and carbon fiber. The results obtained show the mechanical strength of each material where it will be used to compare the value of von-Mises stress, stiffness and total deformation to acquire the best suitable ring diameter and material. Based on the result, as the diameter of the ring increases, the stiffness of the ring will be decreased. 


1987 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 734-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
J B Finlay ◽  
T K Moroz ◽  
C H Rorabeck ◽  
J R Davey ◽  
R B Bourne

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issei Nomura ◽  
Koji Watanabe ◽  
Hidenori Matsubara ◽  
Hideji Nishida ◽  
Toshiharu Shirai ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (03) ◽  
pp. 86-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Foutz ◽  
W. G. Keller ◽  
J. Brown ◽  
D. N. Aron

SummaryAn intramedullary (IM) pin external skeletal fixator “tie-in” configuration is described, for use as a stabilizing device, in the treatment of fractures of the humerus and femur in the dog and cat. With in vitro testing of the configuration using cadaver bones, more resistance to bending was gained by the tie-in arrangement than was possible with one not tied-in. Forty-one clinical cases documented the use of the tie-in configuration for fracture repair. Twenty-four dogs and 17 cats were treated over the past seven years. Fourteen were used to stabilize fractures of the humerus and 27 for the femur. Migration of the IM pin or external fixation frame was not seen and all of the cases went to bone union. The unconventional method of leaving the IM pin protruding from the skin did not lead to complications. All of the owners, contacted from one to two months after removal of the implants, reported their animals to have excellent or good results. Five animals were lost to follow-up.


Injury ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 730-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lerner ◽  
Shay Freiman ◽  
Gabriel Nierenberg ◽  
Haim Stein

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vossoughi ◽  
Y. Youm ◽  
M. Bosse ◽  
A. R. Burgess ◽  
A. Poka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document