Impaired performance on the angle board test is induced in a model of painful whiplash injury but is only transient in a model of cervical radiculopathy

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine M. Dunk ◽  
Kristen J. Nicholson ◽  
Beth A. Winkelstein
2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter P. Siegmund ◽  
John R. Brault ◽  
Dennis D. Chimich

BMJ ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 339 (oct07 1) ◽  
pp. b3952-b3952 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D. Cassidy

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1068
Author(s):  
Wojciech Pisula ◽  
Klaudia Modlinska ◽  
Katarzyna Goncikowska ◽  
Anna Chrzanowska

This study focuses on the rat activity in a hole–board setting that we considered a type of exploratory behavior. The general hypothesis is based on the claim that a motivational mechanism is central to both the response to novelty in a highly familiarized environment and the activity in the hole–board apparatus. Our sample consisted of 80 experimentally naive Lister Hooded rats. All rats were tested in the hole–board apparatus. Twenty individuals with the highest hole-board scores and twenty subjects with the lowest hole–board scores subsequently underwent an established free-exploration test. In our study, the scores obtained in the hole–board test had little predictive value for the rats’ activity in the free-exploration test. Based on our previous experience in studying exploratory behavior in the free-exploration test and the data presented in this paper, we suggest that the hole–board test is not an appropriate tool for measuring exploratory behavior in laboratory rodents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document