Surgical lymph node assessment influences adjuvant therapy in clinically apparent stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, meeting Mayo criteria for lymphadenectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 1292-1298
Author(s):  
Adam Pendlebury ◽  
Milena Radeva ◽  
Peter G. Rose
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1627-1632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Grassi ◽  
Andrea Mariani ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Pamela T Soliman ◽  
Vera J Suman ◽  
...  

BackgroundIn the primary treatment of apparent uterine-confined endometrial carcinoma, pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy has been considered the standard of care. Although some retrospective data suggest that the sentinel lymph node algorithm without complete lymphadenectomy can be used without jeopardizing oncologic outcome, prospective data are lacking.Primary ObjectivesTo assess the 36 month incidence of pelvic/non-vaginal recurrence in women with pathologically confirmed stage I intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who have bilateral negative pelvic sentinel lymph nodes.Study HypothesisWe hypothesize that patients with stage I, intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who have bilateral negative pelvic sentinel lymph nodes will demonstrate a pelvic/non-vaginal recurrence rate comparable to historical estimate of stage I, intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients (estimated 2.5%).Trial DesignThis prospective multicenter single-arm observational study will follow women with stage I, intermediate risk endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma who have undergone successful hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsies, for recurrence. All patients will undergo lymphatic mapping using indocynanine green and will either receive no adjuvant treatment or vaginal brachytherapy only. Patients will be followed for 36 months.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaPatients will be enrolled in the study cohort if all the following criteria are met: (i) at time of surgery: hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, and successful bilateral pelvic sentinel lymph node mapping; (ii) on final pathology: pathologic stage I, intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (grade 1 or grade 2 with ≥50% myometrial invasion, or grade 3 with <50% myometrial invasion), negative pelvic peritoneal cytology, and bilateral sentinel lymph nodes negative for malignancy; (iii) recommended adjuvant treatment: vaginal brachytherapy or no adjuvant treatment.Primary EndpointIncidence of pelvic/non-vaginal recurrence at 36 months.Sample Size182 patients for study cohortEstimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAccrual will be completed in 2023 with results reported in 2026.Trial RegistrationNCT04291612


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia R. Gómez-Hidalgo ◽  
Ling Chen ◽  
June Y. Hou ◽  
Ana I. Tergas ◽  
Caryn M. St. Clair ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan L. Cox ◽  
Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang ◽  
Paul J. Speicher ◽  
Kevin L. Anderson ◽  
Zachary W. Fitch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Chen ◽  
Yan Feng ◽  
Wenwen Wang ◽  
Weiguo Lv ◽  
Baohua Li

Abstract Background Earlier literature suggests that ovarian preservation in young premenopausal clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma patients does not negatively impact prognosis and is a more suitable choice for management of the disease. The main purpose of this study was to clarify the incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in premenopausal clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and further identify potential preoperative predictive factors of ovarian malignant involvement. Methods Premenopausal patients (≤50 years) with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma subjected to total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection at Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine between 2002 and 2016 were enrolled for study. Patients were excluded in cases of gross extra pelvic disease on examination or imaging and family history of colon or gastrointestinal carcinoma. The included patient population was examined for incidence of ovarian malignant involvement and potential preoperative clinical predictive factors.Results A total of 511 premenopausal (age≤50 years) patients diagnosed with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma were enrolled for the study. Ovarian malignant involvements were detected in 23 of the patients (4.5%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed poorer prognoses of patients with ovarian malignant involvement than those without ovarian involvement. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis validated preoperative imaging of myometrial invasion depth, the gross appearance of the ovaries, and preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level as independent risk predictors of postoperative ovarian malignant involvement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was individually generated for preoperative myometrial invasion depth, the gross appearance of the ovaries, and serum CA125 level as well as a combination of the three factors. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.757–0.960) for the combined three factors.Conclusions The incidence of ovarian malignant involvement in premenopausal patients with clinical stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma was relatively minimal. Preoperative imaging of myometrial invasion depth, the gross appearance of the ovaries, and serum CA125 level were independent risk predictors of ovarian malignant involvement. These findings may facilitate preoperative counseling of patients and informed clinical decision-making on ovarian preservation in these patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1912-1918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Kyoung Kim ◽  
Taek Sang Lee ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
Jong-Min Lee ◽  
Beob Jong Kim ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate current clinical management of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) in Korea.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a Web-based survey among members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group regarding their treatment of LMS.ResultsIn total, 77 (27.8%) of 277 members responded to the survey. For surgical treatment of stage I LMS, 26.8% indicated total hysterectomy only and 16.9% indicated total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Also, lymph node dissection was indicated by 54.9% of respondents, whereas 46.5% stated that bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy could be omitted in young patients. More than half (57.7%) of the respondents recommended against adjuvant treatment. For stage I LMS diagnosed after morcellation, 79.2% of the respondents recommended lymph node dissection and 56.4% recommended adjuvant therapy. As for advanced-stage LMS, in cases of complete resection, adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred by 63.1%. For incomplete resection, combined radiotherapy/chemotherapy was the most preferred adjuvant therapy (63.1%).ConclusionsAmong Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group members, there are many discrepancies in the clinical management of LMS. A large-scale prospective study to establish treatment guidelines is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document