Applying Zooarchaeological Methods to Interpret Mortuary Behaviour and Taphonomy in Commingled Burials: The Case Study of the Late Neolithic Site of Bolores, Portugal

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 524-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Mack ◽  
A. J. Waterman ◽  
A-M. Racila ◽  
J. A. Artz ◽  
K. T. Lillios
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 52-63
Author(s):  
Mihai Dunca ◽  
Sanda Băcueț Crișan

This article analyses ground stone discoveries from the late neolithic site of Pericei located in north-west of Romania, in Șimleu Depression. Combined characteristics of chisels and adzes in working process are discussed along with their context, especially those connected to stone working: the layer, dwellings and pebble agglomerations. We conclude that Pericei was a production center for stone chisels, appeared to supply the demand that until then was satisfied by Suplac/Porț site that continued to produce ground stone tools for a longer period.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1 and 2) ◽  
pp. 11-30
Author(s):  
Lionel Sims ◽  
David Fisher

Three recent independently developed models suggest that some Neolithic and Bronze Age monuments exhibit dual design properties in monument complexes by pairing obverse structures. Parker Pearson’s1 materiality model proposes that monuments of wood are paired with monuments of stone, these material metaphors respectively signifying places of rituals for the living with rituals for the dead. Higginbottom’s2 landscape model suggests that many western Scottish megalithic structures are paired in mirror-image landscape locations in which the horizon distance, direction and height of one site is the topographical reverse of the paired site – all in the service of ritually experiencing the liminal boundaries to the world. Sims’3 diacritical model suggests that materials, landscapes and lunar-solar alignments are diacritically combined to facilitate cyclical ritual processions between paired monuments through a simulated underworld. All three models combine in varying degrees archaeology and archaeoastronomy and our paper tests them through the case study of the late Neolithic/EBA Stonehenge Palisade in the Stonehenge monument complex.


2016 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 134-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Cristiani ◽  
V. Dimitrijević ◽  
S. Vitezović

Antiquity ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (347) ◽  
pp. 1096-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver E. Craig ◽  
Lisa-Marie Shillito ◽  
Umberto Albarella ◽  
Sarah Viner-Daniels ◽  
Ben Chan ◽  
...  

Abstract


Epohi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hristina Markova ◽  
◽  
◽  

The worked bones from the Late Neolithic site Hotnitsa–Orlovka provide information about production and use of bone objects from Central North Bulgaria in this period. The domesticated animals are the main source of the bone industry (mainly large ungulates like Bos taurus and smaller mammals like ovis/capra). The ancient inhabitants of Hotnitsa–Orlovka prefered the longitudinally split long bones (mainly metapodium) and flat bones (ribs). The finishing of the bone objects is produced by abrision with sandstones. It is observed that some of the types have productive standardization which was planned specifically so that the use of unnecessary labor and the throwing away of raw material are avoided. This in turn leads to the thought of specialized bone industry. Despite the lack on stratigraphy posiotion of the artefacts, paralels can be drawn between the general characteristics of the findings from Hotnitsa– Orlovka and a number of other Late Neolithic sites from the Balkans.


2016 ◽  
Vol 404 ◽  
pp. 56-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferran Antolín ◽  
Niels Bleicher ◽  
Christoph Brombacher ◽  
Marlu Kühn ◽  
Bigna L. Steiner ◽  
...  

Radiocarbon ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Quarta ◽  
M D'Elia ◽  
E Ingravallo ◽  
I Tiberi ◽  
L Calcagnile

Bone and charcoal samples from the Neolithic site of Serra Cicora in the Salento Peninsula (southern Italy) have been dated by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Measurements appear to support other archaeological evidence and have shown that 2 distinct phases of human occupation of the site can be identified: the first occupation in the Early Neolithic and a second occupation in the Middle-Late Neolithic. The results provide new information and are a fundamental contribution to the definition of the absolute chronology of the Middle-Late Neolithic in this part of Europe.


2016 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wu ◽  
XiaoNing Guo ◽  
WeiLin Wang ◽  
XiangLong Chen ◽  
Zhijun Zhao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document