Selecting effective academic interventions: An example using brief experimental analysis for oral reading

2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Wilber ◽  
Thomas P. Cushman
Psychology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1944-1959
Author(s):  
Meghan Ferraro ◽  
Amanda Smith ◽  
Edward Snyder ◽  
Cristin Leahy ◽  
Kaylee Cavanah

1999 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Daly ◽  
Brian K. Martens ◽  
Kendra R. Hamler ◽  
Eric J. Dool ◽  
Tanya L. Eckert

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin S. Codding ◽  
Stephanie Baglici ◽  
Dana Gottesman ◽  
Mitchelle Johnson ◽  
Allison Schaffer Kert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 153450841988393
Author(s):  
Nicole M. McKevett ◽  
Robin S. Codding

Brief experimental analysis (BEA) is a quick method used to identify the function of student learning difficulties and match effective interventions to students’ needs. Extensive work has been done to explore the use of this methodology to determine effective reading interventions; however, a smaller number of published studies have examined the use of BEAs in math. The purpose of the current review was to identify all studies that have used BEA methodology in math. Fifteen studies that included 63 participants and used BEA methodology to identify the most effective math intervention for students were located. Results of the synthesis indicate that the majority of BEAs compared skill and performance interventions on computational fluency; however, the methodology across the included studies varied. Strengths and limitations of the research, in addition to implications for research and practice, are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa N. Andersen ◽  
Edward J. Daly ◽  
Nicholas D. Young

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document