Evaluation of muscle lipid extraction and non‐lethal fin tissue use for carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotope analyses in adult salmonids

Author(s):  
Sarah M. Larocque ◽  
Aaron T. Fisk ◽  
Timothy B. Johnson
Geobiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Gomes ◽  
D. A. Fike ◽  
K. D. Bergmann ◽  
C. Jones ◽  
A. H. Knoll

1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1689-1695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert O. van Everdingen ◽  
M. Asif Shakur ◽  
Frederick A. Michel

The Paint Pots in Kootenay National Park (British Columbia) appear to derive the Fe, Zn, Pb, and [Formula: see text] contents of their water from sulfide mineralization in Lower and Middle Cambrian carbonates. The Fe, Zn, Ni, and [Formula: see text] contents of groundwater discharging into a tributary of Engineer Creek (Yukon) are likely derived from sulfide mineralization in Devonian or Ordovician black shales exposed in the area. The high Fe and [Formula: see text] contents of a natrojarosite deposit northeast of Fort Norman (Northwest Territories) are probably derived from pyritiferous Cretaceous shales in that area. Isotope analyses of water and of dissolved and precipitated sulfur species from these three sites where acidic, heavy-metal-bearing groundwater is being discharged revealed that between 38 and 74% of the oxygen used in the subsurface oxidation of metal sulfides is supplied by H2O molecules rather than by molecular (dissolved) oxygen. The available data also suggest that lower percentages of water oxygen in the secondary sulfates reflect increasing activity of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans or similar bacteria in the oxidation process.


1993 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutsuo Hatano ◽  
Daisuke Deguchi ◽  
Koretaro Takahashi

1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1246-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert O. van Everdingen ◽  
M. Asif Shakur ◽  
H. Roy Krouse

Previous sulfur isotope data for the Lower Devonian Bear Rock Formation and the Upper Cambrian Saline River Formation in the District of Mackenzie, N.W.T. have been supplemented by additional sulfur isotope analyses as well as δ18O determinations on sulfates from outcrops, drill cuttings, and cores. Whereas the mean δ34S value for the Bear Rock Formation is lower than that of the Saline River Formation (+17.8 ± 1.8‰ versus +29.7 ± 2.2‰), the opposite trend was found for the mean δ18O values (+15.6 ± 1.0‰ versus +13.0 ± 1.5‰). The new data confirm that, for all samples analysed, there is no overlap between δ34S values for the two formations, while the δ18O data display some overlap. The earlier δ34S data for samples from an evaporitic section on the northeast side of the Norman Range (originally mapped as consisting entirely of Saline River Formation) indicated the presence of a thrust fault in the section, with Saline River strata overlying Bear Rock strata. The δ18O data for those samples, which fortuitously fall into two non-overlapping groups, confirm the earlier conclusions based on the δ34S data and allow us to define the position of the thrust-fault contact somewhat more closely.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document