SANDRA: a portable XRF system for the study of Mexican cultural heritage

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Ruvalcaba Sil ◽  
D. Ramírez Miranda ◽  
V. Aguilar Melo ◽  
F. Picazo
2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (S3) ◽  
pp. 2020-2021
Author(s):  
Nicholas Barbi ◽  
Roberto Alberti ◽  
Luca Bombelli ◽  
Tommaso Frizzi

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. C10004-C10004 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Guerra ◽  
M Manso ◽  
S Longelin ◽  
S Pessanha ◽  
M L Carvalho
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-463
Author(s):  
So-Mang Lim ◽  
Young-Suk Kwon ◽  
Young-Rae Cho ◽  
Won-Sub Chung

In this study we conducted component analyses of portable XRF detectors using four Au-Cu alloy standard samples to improve their accuracy by drawing up a calibration curve based on ICP-OES standard values. The portable XRF analysis found absolute errors of 0.3 to 3.7 wt% for Au and 0.2 to 8.2 wt% for Cu, confirming that the error range and standard deviation differed from one detector to another. Furthermore, the calibration curve improved their accuracy, such that the relative error rates of Au and Cu decreased from 9.8% and 14% to 3.5% and 3.7%, respectively. Accordingly, an experiment to confirm the calibration curve was conducted using unknown samples, finding that the measured values of the unknown samples fell on the calibration curve. Therefore, to accurately analyze the components of metal cultural heritage items, it is necessary to prepare a calibration curve for each element after checking whether the detector is suitable for the artifact.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document