Induction of Relational Schemas: Common Processes in Reasoning and Complex Learning

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme S. Halford ◽  
John D. Bain ◽  
Murray T. Maybery ◽  
Glenda Andrews
1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-233
Author(s):  
Edward H. Matthei

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur C. Graesser ◽  
Sidney K. D'mello
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret O. Wright ◽  
Susan F. Folger ◽  
Carolyn R. Shainheit

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney D’Mello ◽  
Art Graesser

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-206
Author(s):  
Janet Dickinson ◽  
Mandy Miller

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Lupyan

AbstractThe target article provides a convincing argument that nonhuman animals cannot process role-governed rules, relational schemas, and so on, in a human-like fashion. However, actual human performance is often more similar to that of nonhuman animals than Penn et al. admit. The kind of rule-governed performance the authors take for granted may rely to a substantial degree on language on external symbol systems such as those provided by language and culture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document