scholarly journals A Completeness Theorem for the Expressive Power of Higher-Order Algebraic Specifications

1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 502-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Meinke
Keyword(s):  
Expressive Power ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Algebraic Specifications ◽  
Order Algebraic

The Complexity of Model-Checking Tail-Recursive Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic

2021 ◽  
Vol 178 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Florian Bruse ◽  
Martin Lange ◽  
Etienne Lozes
Keyword(s):  
Model Checking ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
High Complexity ◽  
Transition Systems ◽  
Recursive Formulas ◽  
Second Order Logic ◽  
Monadic Second Order Logic

Higher-Order Fixpoint Logic (HFL) is a modal specification language whose expressive power reaches far beyond that of Monadic Second-Order Logic, achieved through an incorporation of a typed λ-calculus into the modal μ-calculus. Its model checking problem on finite transition systems is decidable, albeit of high complexity, namely k-EXPTIME-complete for formulas that use functions of type order at most k < 0. In this paper we present a fragment with a presumably easier model checking problem. We show that so-called tail-recursive formulas of type order k can be model checked in (k − 1)-EXPSPACE, and also give matching lower bounds. This yields generic results for the complexity of bisimulation-invariant non-regular properties, as these can typically be defined in HFL.

A completeness theorem for higher order logics

2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 857-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Sági
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Representation Theorem ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Algebraic Solution ◽  
Algebraic Proof ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Strong Representation ◽  
Algebraic Counterpart

AbstractHere we investigate the classes of representable directed cylindric algebras of dimension α introduced by Németi [12]. can be seen in two different ways: first, as an algebraic counterpart of higher order logics and second, as a cylindric algebraic analogue of Quasi-Projective Relation Algebras. We will give a new, “purely cylindric algebraic” proof for the following theorems of Németi: (i) is a finitely axiomatizable variety whenever α ≥ 3 is finite and (ii) one can obtain a strong representation theorem for if one chooses an appropriate (non-well-founded) set theory as foundation of mathematics. These results provide a purely cylindric algebraic solution for the Finitization Problem (in the sense of [11]) in some non-well-founded set theories.

Normal-Velocity Relaxation and Higher Order Algebraic Heat Flux Models Applicable to an Axisymmetric Impinging Jet

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzad Bazdidi-Tehrani ◽  
Alireza Imanifar ◽  
Siavash Khajehhasani ◽  
Mehran Rajabi-Zargarabadi
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Impinging Jet ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Order Algebraic

Sound and complete models of contracts

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 375-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHIAS BLUME ◽  
DAVID McALLESTER
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Original Version ◽  
Order Types ◽  
Restricted Form ◽  
Soundness And Completeness ◽  
Recursive Contracts ◽  
Intuitive Interpretation ◽  
Typed Languages

Even in statically typed languages it is useful to have certain invariants checked dynamically. Findler and Felleisen gave an algorithm for dynamically checking expressive higher-order types called contracts. They did not, however, give a semantics of contracts. The lack of a semantics makes it impossible to define and prove soundness and completeness of the checking algorithm. (Given a semantics, a sound checker never reports violations that do not exist under that semantics; a complete checker is – in principle – able to find violations when violations exist.) Ideally, a semantics should capture what programmers intuitively feel is the meaning of a contract or otherwise clearly point out where intuition does not match reality. In this paper we give an interpretation of contracts for which we prove the Findler-Felleisen algorithm sound and (under reasonable assumptions) complete. While our semantics mostly matches intuition, it also exposes a problem with predicate contracts where an arguably more intuitive interpretation than ours would render the checking algorithm unsound. In our semantics we have to make use of a notion of safety (which we define in the paper) to avoid unsoundness. We are able to eliminate the “leakage” of safety into the semantics by changing the language, replacing the original version of unrestricted predicate contracts with a restricted form. The corresponding loss in expressive power can be recovered by making safety explicit as a contract. This can be done either in ad-hoc fashion or by including general recursive contracts. The addition of recursive contracts has far-reaching implications, deeply affecting the formulation of our model and requiring different techniques for proving soundness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document