Biomechanical Bases for Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Instability in the Young Patient

Author(s):  
Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso ◽  
Jaime M. Prat-Pastor ◽  
Carlos M. Atienza-Vicente ◽  
Carlos Puig-Abbs ◽  
Mario Comín-Clavijo
Author(s):  
Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso ◽  
Erik Montesinos-Berry ◽  
Agustin Serrano ◽  
Vicente Martínez-Sanjuan

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso ◽  
Scott F. Dye

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 935-936
Author(s):  
Ali Al Kaissi ◽  
Klaus Klaushofer ◽  
Franz Grill

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  

Patients with a patellofemoral pain are either in an acute state after a patellofemoral dislocation or are suffering from a chronic anterior knee pain (AKP), whereas AKP might be accompanied by patellar instability without dislocation. Whereas the acute state after a dislocation is mostly clear and its examination limited, the examination of a AKP is much more complex. A profound knowledge of the anatomy, the painful structures and patellofemoral biomechanics is essential in order to find the underlying pathology within the heterogeneous and diverse etiologies. Furthermore, a meticulous and precise examination is key to find the adequate treatment for AKP.


Author(s):  
Arjun R. H. H. ◽  
Rama Kishan ◽  
Dhillon M. S. ◽  
Devender Chouhan

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Diagnosis of patellofemroal pain syndrome has been challenging due to lack of clinical test with better sensitivity and specificity, axial imaging has been considered as the standard modality for evaluation. Patients with anterior knee pain because of patellofemoral pain syndrome can be sub-grouped as those with or without radiological positive parameter for patellar maltracking.  The aim of the present study was to evaluate reliability of clinical tests in two subgroups of patients presenting with patellofemoral pain syndrome<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 45 knees with anterior knee pain without any episode of patellar instability were evaluated clinically using four standard tests (patellar apprehension test (PAT), eccentric step test (EST), active instability test (AIT) and Waldron’s test. On the basis of CT scan finding (at least one positive radiological parameter of instability) 28 knees were categorized in Group A (potential patellar instability group) and 17 knees in Group B (PFPS).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> All patients with 3 or more than three clinical test positive were cases with potential patellofemroal instability except two. Whereas other true patellofemroal pain patients all except 2 were have less than 3 positive clinical tests<span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Clinical test have more diagnostic accuracy in evaluating anterior knee pain due to potential patellofemroal instability in comparison to patellofemroal pain without radiological instability<span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 921-921
Author(s):  
Ali Al Kaissi ◽  
Klaus Klaushoferl ◽  
Franz Grill

2003 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 697-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso ◽  
Esther Roselló-Sastre

Author(s):  
Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso ◽  
Carolina Ávila-Carrasco ◽  
Jaime M. Prat-Pastor ◽  
Carlos M. Atienza ◽  
Enrique Cuñat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document