An Approximation of Action Theories of $\mathcal{AL}$ and Its Application to Conformant Planning

Author(s):  
Tran Cao Son ◽  
Phan Huy Tu ◽  
Michael Gelfond ◽  
A. Ricardo Morales
2011 ◽  
Vol 175 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phan Huy Tu ◽  
Tran Cao Son ◽  
Michael Gelfond ◽  
A. Ricardo Morales

Analysis ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
N. Griffin
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (06) ◽  
pp. 10017-10024
Author(s):  
Xiaodi Zhang ◽  
Alban Grastien ◽  
Enrico Scala

In a counter-example based approach to conformant planning, choosing the right counter-example can improve performance. We formalise this observation by introducing the notion of “superiority” of a counter-example over another one, that holds whenever the superior counter-example exhibits more tags than the latter. We provide a theoretical explanation that supports the strategy of searching for maximally superior counter-examples, and we show how this strategy can be implemented. The empirical experiments validate our approach.


Author(s):  
William J. Abraham

In sorting through how best to understand the work of Christ we need a narrative that captures the core meaning of “atonement” and a way to deploy the various theories that abound in the tradition. At the root of the issue is a narrative of reconciliation that highlights the serious alienation that exists between human agents and God. Fixing this problem requires both divine and human action. Theories of atonement seek to spell out the divine action involved. Each has its own advantage in developing complementary descriptions of what has gone wrong with the world and how to fix it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document