Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins in Cancer Progression and Metastasis

Author(s):  
Marleen Van Troys ◽  
Joël Vandekerckhove ◽  
Christophe Ampe
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Izdebska ◽  
Wioletta Zielińska ◽  
Dariusz Grzanka ◽  
Maciej Gagat

Metastasis causes death of 90% of cancer patients, so it is the most significant issue associated with cancer disease. Thus, it is no surprise that many researchers are trying to develop drugs targeting or preventing them. The secondary tumour site formation is closely related to phenomena like epithelial-to-mesenchymal and its reverse, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. The change of the cells’ phenotype to mesenchymal involves the acquisition of migratory potential. Cancer cells movement is possible due to the development of invasive structures like invadopodia, lamellipodia, and filopodia. These changes are dependent on the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. In turn, the polymerization and depolymerization of actin are controlled by actin-binding proteins. In many tumour cells, the actin and actin-associated proteins are accumulated in the cell nucleus, suggesting that it may also affect the progression of cancer by regulating gene expression. Once the cancer cell reaches a new habitat it again acquires epithelial features and thus proliferative activity. Targeting of epithelial-to-mesenchymal or/and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions through regulation of their main components expression may be a potential solution to the problem of metastasis. This work focuses on the role of these processes in tumour progression and the assessment of therapeutic potential of agents targeting them.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S240
Author(s):  
M. Bathe ◽  
M. Claessens ◽  
E. Frey ◽  
A. Bausch

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Uribe ◽  
David Jay

2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 106a-107a
Author(s):  
María del Rocío Cantero ◽  
Horacio F. Cantiello

1996 ◽  
Vol 325 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-P. Janssen ◽  
L. Eichinger ◽  
P.A. Janmey ◽  
A.A. Noegel ◽  
M. Schliwa ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 9 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 521-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Schleicher ◽  
Elisabeth André ◽  
Herbert Hartmann ◽  
Angelika A. Noegel

1994 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mulholland ◽  
D Preuss ◽  
A Moon ◽  
A Wong ◽  
D Drubin ◽  
...  

We characterized the yeast actin cytoskeleton at the ultrastructural level using immunoelectron microscopy. Anti-actin antibodies primarily labeled dense, patchlike cortical structures and cytoplasmic cables. This localization recapitulates results obtained with immunofluorescence light microscopy, but at much higher resolution. Immuno-EM double-labeling experiments were conducted with antibodies to actin together with antibodies to the actin binding proteins Abp1p and cofilin. As expected from immunofluorescence experiments, Abp1p, cofilin, and actin colocalized in immuno-EM to the dense patchlike structures but not to the cables. In this way, we can unambiguously identify the patches as the cortical actin cytoskeleton. The cortical actin patches were observed to be associated with the cell surface via an invagination of plasma membrane. This novel cortical cytoskeleton-plasma membrane interface appears to consist of a fingerlike invagination of plasma membrane around which actin filaments and actin binding proteins are organized. We propose a possible role for this unique cortical structure in wall growth and osmotic regulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document