Themodynamic Mechano-Chemistry of Single Motor Enzymes

Author(s):  
Katsuhisa Tawada ◽  
Yasuhiro Imafuku ◽  
Neil Thomas
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1685-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Dakin ◽  
Brian H. Dalton ◽  
Billy L. Luu ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Blouin

Rectification of surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings prior to their correlation with other signals is a widely used form of preprocessing. Recently this practice has come into question, elevating the subject of EMG rectification to a topic of much debate. Proponents for rectifying suggest it accentuates the EMG spike timing information, whereas opponents indicate it is unnecessary and its nonlinear distortion of data is potentially destructive. Here we examine the necessity of rectification on the extraction of muscle responses, but for the first time using a known oscillatory input to the muscle in the form of electrical vestibular stimulation. Participants were exposed to sinusoidal vestibular stimuli while surface and intramuscular EMG were recorded from the left medial gastrocnemius. We compared the unrectified and rectified surface EMG to single motor units to determine which method best identified stimulus-EMG coherence and phase at the single-motor unit level. Surface EMG modulation at the stimulus frequency was obvious in the unrectified surface EMG. However, this modulation was not identified by the fast Fourier transform, and therefore stimulus coherence with the unrectified EMG signal failed to capture this covariance. Both the rectified surface EMG and single motor units displayed significant coherence over the entire stimulus bandwidth (1–20 Hz). Furthermore, the stimulus-phase relationship for the rectified EMG and motor units shared a moderate correlation ( r = 0.56). These data indicate that rectification of surface EMG is a necessary step to extract EMG envelope modulation due to motor unit entrainment to a known stimulus.


Author(s):  
Yalda Nozad Mojaver ◽  
Paul Tawadros ◽  
Polyana Moura Ferreira ◽  
Terry Whittle ◽  
Greg M. Murray

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana M. Degani ◽  
Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos ◽  
Mark L. Latash

We tested the hypothesis that a sequence of mechanical events occurs preceding a step that scales in time and magnitude as a whole in a task-specific manner, and is a reflection of a “motor program.” Young subjects made a step under three speed instructions and four tasks: stepping straight ahead, down a stair, up a stair, and over an obstacle. Larger center-of-pressure (COP) and force adjustments in the anteriorposterior direction and smaller COP and force adjustments in the mediolateral direction were seen during stepping forward and down a stair, as compared with the tasks of stepping up a stair and over an obstacle. These differences were accentuated during stepping under the simple reaction time instruction. These results speak against the hypothesis of a single motor program that would underlie postural preparation to stepping. They are more compatible with the reference configuration hypothesis of whole-body actions.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo?e V. Trontelj ◽  
Erik St??lberg

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 751-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Phanachet ◽  
T. Whittle ◽  
K. Wanigaratne ◽  
G. M. Murray

The precise function of the inferior head of the human lateral pterygoid muscle (IHLP) is unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the normal function of the IHLP. The hypothesis was that an important function of the IHLP is the generation and fine control of horizontal (i.e., anteroposterior and mediolateral) jaw movements. The activities of 50 single motor units (SMUs) were recorded from IHLP (14 subjects) during two- or three-step contralateral movement ( n = 36) and/or protrusion ( n = 33). Most recording sites were identified by computer tomography. There was a statistically significant overall increase in firing rate as the magnitude of jaw displacement increased between the holding phases (range of increments: 0.3–1.6 mm). The firing rates during the dynamic phases for each unit were significantly greater than those during the previous holding phases but less than those during the subsequent holding phases. For the contralateral step task at the intermediate rate, the cross-correlation coefficients between jaw displacement in the mediolateral axis and the mean firing rate of each unit ranged from r = 0.29 to 0.77; mean ± SD; r = 0.49 ± 0.13 (protrusive step task: r = 0.12–0.74, r = 0.44 ± 0.14 for correlation with anterior–posterior axis). The correlation coefficients at the fast rate during the contralateral step task and the protrusive step task were significantly higher than those at the slow rate. The firing rate change of the SMUs per unit displacement between holding phases was significantly greater for the lower-threshold than for the higher-threshold units during contralateral movement and protrusion. After dividing IHLP into four regions, the SMUs recorded in the superior part exhibited significantly greater mean firing rate changes per unit displacement during protrusion than for the SMUs recorded in the inferior part. Significantly fewer units were related to the protrusive task in the superior–medial part. These data support previously proposed notions of functional heterogeneity within IHLP. The present findings provide further evidence for an involvement of the IHLP in the generation and fine control of horizontal jaw movements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document