The Complex Number System

Author(s):  
Bruce P. Palka
Keyword(s):  
1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-176
Author(s):  
Vicky L. Kouba

Too often in the past “arithmetic” has been viewed as simple computing or simple acquisition of procedures. In contrast, the chapters in Analysis of Arithmetic for Mathematics Teaching portray arithmetic as a thoughtful building of a flexible knowledge of our complex number system, rich in concepts, connections, and patterns that are crucial for understanding most of the rest of mathematics. This book provides research foundations and conceptual analyses of the standard topics of arithmetic: understanding of and operations on whole numbers, fractions, and decimals. The authors provide updates on the results, theories, and thoughts about children's learning of arithmetic concepts and processes, a field that has coalesced over the past twenty years.


1932 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
R. Wilson

§ 1. Introduction. Little is known concerning the theory of resultants of equations other than in the complex number system. The cyclic number systems provide a simple example which is not a division algebra. In such a system with n units er. any number y ≡ y0 + y1e1 + y2e2 + … + yn−1en−1 has coefficients yr drawn from a field, and the units satisfy the product law:


Author(s):  
Daniel Tischhauser

It is well established the complex exponential and logarithm are multivalued functions, both failing to maintain most identities originally valid over the positive integers domain. Moreover the general case of complex logarithm, with a complex base, is hardly mentionned in mathematic litterature. We study the exponentiation and logarithm as binary operations where all operands are complex. In a redefined complex number system using an extension of the C field, hereafter named E, we prove both operations always produce single value results and maintain the validity of identities such as logu (w v) = logu (w) + logu (v) where u, v, w in E. There is a cost as some algebraic properties of the addition and subtraction will be diminished, though remaining valid to a certain extent. In order to handle formulas in a C and E dual number system, we introduce the notion of set precision and set truncation. We show complex numbers as defined in C are insufficiently precise to grasp all subtleties of some complex operations, as a result multivaluation, identity failures and, in specific cases, wrong results are obtained when computing exclusively in C. A geometric representation of the new complex number system is proposed, in which the complex plane appears as an orthogonal projection, and where the complex logarithm an exponentiation can be simply represented. Finally we attempt an algebraic formalization of E.


Author(s):  
Tariq Jamil ◽  
David Blest ◽  
Amer Al-Habsi

For years complex numbers have been treated as distant relatives of real numbers despite their widespread applications in the fields of electrical and computer engineering. These days computer operations involving complex numbers are most commonly performed by applying divide-and-conquer technique whereby each complex number is separated into its real and imaginary parts, operations are carried out on each group of real and imaginary components, and then the final result of the operation is obtained by accumulating the individual results of the real and imaginary components. This technique forsakes the advantages of using complex numbers in computer arithmetic and there exists a need, at least for some problems, to treat a complex number as one unit and to carry out all operations in this form. In this paper, we have analyzed and proposed a (–1–j)-base binary number system for complex numbers. We have discussed the arithmetic operations of two such binary numbers and outlined work which is currently underway in this area of computer arithmetic.  


1976 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
Susan J. Grant ◽  
Ward R. Stewart

Most students are faced with the task of solving the equation x2 + 1 = 0 over the real numbers at some time in their algebra classes. After they substitute values for x unsuccessfully, they usually attempt to solve the equivalent equation x2 = -1. They soon realize that it is impossible to square a real number and obtain a negative number. At this point their teacher may define the imaginary number i to be and then proceed to develop the complex number system.


Author(s):  
Daniel Tischhauser

It is well established the complex exponential and logarithm are multivalued functions, both failing to maintain most identities originally valid over the positive integers domain. Moreover the general case of complex logarithm, with a complex base, is hardly mentionned in mathematic litterature. We study the exponentiation and logarithm as binary operations where all operands are complex. In a redefined complex number system using an extension of the C field, hereafter named E, we proove both operations always produce single value results and maintain the validity of identities such as logu (w v) = logu (w) + logu (v) where u, v, w in E. There is a cost as some algebraic properties of the addition and subtraction will be diminished, though remaining valid to a certain extent. In order to handle formulas in a C and E dual number system, we introduce the notion of set precision and set truncation. We show complex numbers as defined in C are insufficiently precise to grasp all subtleties of some complex operations, as a result multivaluation, identity failures and, in specific cases, wrong results are obtained when computing exclusively in C. A geometric representation of the new complex number system is proposed, in which the complex plane appears as an orthogonal projection, and where the complex logarithm an exponentiation can be simply represented. Finally we attempt an algebraic formalization of E.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document