Chronic Nociceptive Pain Syndromes: Cancer Pain

Author(s):  
Russell K. Portenoy
2008 ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Twycross ◽  
Michael Bennett
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
David Y. Lee ◽  
John J. Lee ◽  
Steven H. Richeimer
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Sophia Lam ◽  
Leeroy William ◽  
Peter Poon

Pain ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dermot R. Fitzgibbon ◽  
Bradley S. Galer
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 696-701
Author(s):  
Uri Hochberg ◽  
Asaf Berger ◽  
Miri Atias ◽  
Rotem Tellem ◽  
Ido Strauss

IntroductionNeurosurgical ablative procedures can offer immediate and effective pain relief for patients suffering from refractory cancer pain. However, choosing the appropriate procedure for each patient may not be straightforward and warrants an interdisciplinary approach. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with cancer who were carefully selected for neurosurgical intervention by a dedicated interdisciplinary team composed of a palliative physician and nurse practitioner, a pain specialist and a neurosurgeon.MethodsA retrospective review was carried out on all patients who underwent neurosurgical ablative procedures in our institute between March 2015 and September 2019. All patients had advanced metastatic cancer with unfavorable prognosis and suffered from intractable oncological pain. Each treatment plan was devised to address the patients’ specific pain syndromes.ResultsA total of 204 patients were examined by our service during the study period. Sixty-four patients with localized pain and nineteen patients with diffuse pain syndromes were selected for neurosurgical interventions, either targeted disconnection of the spinothalamic tract or stereotactic cingulotomy. Substantial pain relief was reported by both groups immediately (cordotomy: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 9 ≥1, p=0.001, cingulotomy: NRS 9 ≥2, p=0.001) and maintained along the next 3-month follow-up visits.ConclusionsAn interdisciplinary collaboration designated to provide neurosurgical ablative procedures among carefully selected patients could culminate in substantial relief of intractable cancer pain.Trial registration numberIR0354-17.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. E1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin Viswanathan ◽  
Viraat Harsh ◽  
Erlick A. C. Pereira ◽  
Tipu Z. Aziz

Object Cingulotomy has been reported in the literature as a potential treatment option for refractory cancer-related pain. However, the optimal candidates for this intervention and the outcomes are not well characterized. The goal of this study was to review the available literature on cingulotomy, specifically for cancer-related pain. Methods A search of PubMed, PubMed Central, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE was performed to identify all articles discussing cingulotomy for cancer pain. The text strings “cingul*” and “pain” were separated by the Boolean AND operator, and used to perform the query on PubMed. Only studies in which a stereotactic technique was used, as opposed to an open technique, and specifically detailing outcomes for cancer pain were included. For centers with multiple publications, care was taken not to double-count individual patients. Results The literature review revealed only 8 unique studies describing outcomes of stereotactic cingulotomy for cancer pain. Between 32% and 83% of patients had meaningful pain relief. The location of the lesion was variable, ranging between 1 cm and 4 cm posterior to the tip of the anterior horn. Although serious adverse events are rare, a decline in focused attention can been seen in the early postoperative period, along with apathy and decreased activity. Conclusions For patients with cancer pain with diffuse pain syndromes, head and neck malignancies, and significant emotional distress, cingulotomy may be a safe treatment option with minimal cognitive changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document