Opioid Use Disorders among Patients on Long-Term Morphine for Management of Chronic Cancer Pain: A Pilot Study from a Tertiary Palliative Care Facility

Objectives: Long-term opioid use can be associated with misuse and addiction. In the backdrop of increasing burden of cancer patients in India, it is important to assess the rate of opioid use disorders among those with chronic cancer pain. The objectives were to measure the rate of opioid use disorder in chronic cancer pain patients being managed with morphine and to assess its association with demographic and clinical characteristics. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on chronic cancer pain patients who were prescribed morphine for ≥12 months, dosage of ≥60 mg/day. They were assessed using MINI version 7.0.0, WHO-ASSIST Hindi questionnaire, Addiction Behavior Checklist, and DSM-5 for opioid use disorder. Results: Forty patients who were treated with morphine for a total of 1479 months participated. The average morphine consumption was 159.50 ± 327.90 mg/day. Six (15%) showed possible inappropriate opioid analgesic use and none of the patients had opioid use disorder. Conclusion: This study reports the absence of opioid use disorder due to vigilant use of morphine in chronic cancer patients.

Opioid-sparing effects of medical cannabis or cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and harms of adding medical cannabis to prescription opioids among people living with chronic pain.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesCENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE.Main outcomes and measuresOpioid dose reduction, pain relief, sleep disturbance, physical and emotional functioning and adverse events.Study selection criteria and methodsWe included studies that enrolled patients with chronic pain receiving prescription opioids and explored the impact of adding medical cannabis. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.ResultsEligible studies included five randomised trials (all enrolling chronic cancer-pain patients) and 12 observational studies. All randomised trials instructed participants to maintain their opioid dose, which resulted in a very low certainty evidence that adding cannabis has little or no impact on opioid use (weighted mean difference (WMD) −3.4 milligram morphine equivalent (MME); 95% CI (CI) −12.7 to 5.8). Randomised trials provided high certainty evidence that cannabis addition had little or no effect on pain relief (WMD −0.18 cm; 95% CI −0.38 to 0.02; on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain) or sleep disturbance (WMD −0.22 cm; 95% CI −0.4 to −0.06; on a 10 cm VAS for sleep disturbance; minimally important difference is 1 cm) among chronic cancer pain patients. Addition of cannabis likely increases nausea (relative risk (RR) 1.43; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.96; risk difference (RD) 4%, 95% CI 0% to 7%) and vomiting (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.24; RD 3%; 95% CI 0% to 6%) (both moderate certainty) and may have no effect on constipation (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.35; RD −1%; 95% CI −4% to 2%) (low certainty). Eight observational studies provided very low certainty evidence that adding cannabis reduced opioid use (WMD −22.5 MME; 95% CI −43.06 to −1.97).ConclusionOpioid-sparing effects of medical cannabis for chronic pain remain uncertain due to very low certainty evidence.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018091098.

Pain Diary in Bands Based on SBAR Communication Mode Application of Nursing Management in Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia

Pain diary shows an important role in the pain management of patients with chronic cancer pain, but it has not been mentioned in the nursing management of Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). This study explored the impact of pain diary on patients with postherpetic neuralgia during hospitalization. Patients with postherpetic neuralgia were randomly divided into a pain diary group and a control group. During the hospitalization, the diary group was instructed to record the pain diary, and the control group was given routine care. Evaluating VAS score of the patients for 10 days on admission, Thai Brief Pain questionnaire score during mid-hospitalization, and the amount and satisfaction of the patient's condition information collected upon discharge. On the third day after admission, the VAS score of the diary group was significantly lower than that of the control group. The Thai Brief Pain results showed that the pain diary group had better mood, sleep and enjoyment of life than the control group. The number of patient's condition information from the diary group was significantly more than the control group, the diary group had better satisfaction with nurses and doctors than the control group. The short-term pain diary should have a better role in PHN hospitalization.

The possibilities of using xenon therapy in patients with severe cancer pain

In accordance with the clinical recommendations of the World Health Organization and the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, the main analgesics for the treatment of chronic cancer pain are non-opioid and opioid analgesics, given stepwise in combination with co-analgesics and adjuvant drugs. As a rule, this stepwise scheme of painkilling is effective in most cases. However, 20-30% of patients cannot achieve an acceptable level of pain relief despite the use of these analgesics in combination. Is there another way to help such patients? Interventional methods of analgesia are an option, yet not all patients agree to invasive methods due to the possible side effects and unavailability of these methods. In these cases other mechanisms of analgesia are required, such as NMDA receptor antagonists, which reduce opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia. Still not all the drugs of this group can be applied in our practice. Analgesic properties of nitrous oxide can only be found in high anesthetic doses. Another option is metadon, but it is forbidden and cannot be used in our country. Still one more option is ketamine, which has severe side effects. In our clinical practice we decided to use xenon, which has NMDA inhibition effects. Its analgesic effect and safety have been confirmed in numerous studies. This publication aims to demonstrate a successful clinical case when we used xenon and oxygen inhalations course for the treatment of a severe cancer pain with a patient who had been taking morphine by mouth.

Violence and chronic pain in cancer patients in northeastern Mexico.

e24113 Background: Chronic cancer pain generates fear and anguish in cancer patients. It is suffered by 64% of patients with metastatic or terminal disease, 59% of patients in early and intermediate stages, and 33% of patients cured from cancer. They require a psychosocial support network. This network has been proposed as an essential tool to reduce the negative impact of the symptoms and psychosocial implications of cancer on the quality of life of patients. Patients with dysfunctional family networks can add to the pain of suffering cancer when they suffered or suffer violence. Cancer and pain test all personal resources and the patient's support network where family functioning is capital for quality of life. Methods: Descriptive, comparative and correlational study. A sample was taken for convenience with the prior consent of the patients who attend the outpatient clinic of the Pain Clinic of the Oncology Service, of the University Center Against Cancer of the University Hospital “Dr. José Eleuterio González” in Nuevo León. The questionnaires were applied during a session of 25 to 30 minutes. It was requested to answer the scales to assess the level of intra-family functioning, intra-family violence, quality of life, measuring psychosocial and health variables; as well as for the detection of the type and quality of psychosocial support perceived by the subjects. Results: A total of 207 research subjects were included in the study, the average age was 49 years of age (minimum 12, maximum 81 years of age), 23% men and 77% women. Marital status: married 52%, home-based 63%; monthly income less than $120 USD (n = 75, 37%). The quality of life index and chronic cancer pain had a high linear correlation with the variables of family violence, psychosocial support, family functioning, somatic symptoms, among other variables studied. Fatigue was the symptom most frequently associated with the decrease in the quality of life index. Conclusions: The satisfaction of perceived social support is a factor associated with the quality of life in patients with chronic cancer pain, however, the number of caregivers is not. There was no relationship between the size of the network and satisfaction with it. Also, the symptoms associated with chronic cancer pain affect the quality of life, identity, social functionality and roles, which in turn impact the quality of life perceived by the patient. This study supports our comprehensive intervention programs and new protocols to promote the quality of life of cancer patients.