Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Author(s):  
Pierre Jacquet ◽  
Paul H. Sugarbaker
2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Paula Meier

THERE IS LITTLE DISAGREEMENT AMONG NURSES concerning the need for clinical research to clarify and expand the profession’s knowledge base. Yet if we stop for a moment and reflect on why we perform certain activities in the course of our daily practice, seldom is the reason grounded in research. Our rationales are more likely to be an outcome of our apprentice-style education; we do what we do in the way we do it because a nursing colleague, instructor, or a member of a related health care profession once told us this is the correct way. Although these patterns are difficult to change, we, as nurses, accepted the responsibility for research when we began to refer to ourselves as “professionals.” Members of a profession constantly use research findings to modify their knowledge base; and as a consequence, clients of that profession’s service expect to benefit from the application of new research knowledge to practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Ilana Friedner

Abstract This commentary focuses on three points: the need to consider semiotic ideologies of both researchers and autistic people, questions of commensurability, and problems with “the social” as an analytical concept. It ends with a call for new research methodologies that are not deficit-based and that consider a broad range of linguistic and non-linguistic communicative practices.


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 448-452
Author(s):  
LA Tedesco ◽  
JE Albino ◽  
WM Feagans ◽  
RS Mackenzie

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Madalena Walsh ◽  
Nan Bernstein Ratner
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Brian K. Auge ◽  
Paul K. Pietrow ◽  
Glenn M. Preminger
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document