The Interaction between Viral Messenger RNA and Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2, a Protein Involved in Translational Control

1985 ◽  
pp. 21-48
Author(s):  
Raymond Kaempfer
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 ◽  
Initiation Factor 2

Binding of ATP and messenger RNA by the β-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2

Biochimie ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gonsky ◽  
D. Itamar ◽  
R. Harary ◽  
R. Kaempfer
Keyword(s):  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Β Subunit ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 ◽  
Initiation Factor 2

scholarly journals Requirements for intercistronic distance and level of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 activity in reinitiation on GCN4 mRNA vary with the downstream cistron.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 2616-2628 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Grant ◽  
P F Miller ◽  
A G Hinnebusch
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Amino Acid Availability ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 ◽  
Initiation Factor 2

Translational control of the GCN4 gene in response to amino acid availability is mediated by four short open reading frames in the GCN4 mRNA leader (uORFs) and by phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2). We have proposed that reducing eIF-2 activity by phosphorylation of its alpha subunit or by a mutation in the eIF-2 recycling factor eIF-2B allows ribosomes which have translated the 5'-proximal uORF1 to bypass uORF2 to uORF4 and reinitiate at GCN4 instead. In this report, we present two lines of evidence that all ribosomes which synthesize GCN4 have previously translated uORF1, resumed scanning, and reinitiated at the GCN4 start site. First, GCN4 expression was abolished when uORF1 was elongated to make it overlap the beginning of the GCN4 coding region. Second, GCN4 expression was reduced as uORF1 was moved progressively closer to GCN4, decreasing to only 5% of the level seen in the absence of all uORFs when only 32 nucleotides separated uORF1 from GCN4. We additionally found that inserting small synthetic uORFs between uORF4 and GCN4 inhibited GCN4 expression under derepressing conditions, confirming the idea that reinitiation at GCN4 under conditions of diminished eIF-2 activity is proportional to the distance of the reinitiation site downstream from uORF1. While uORF4 and GCN4 appear to be equally effective at capturing ribosomes scanning downstream from the 5' cap of mRNA, these two ORFs differ greatly in their ability to capture reinitiating ribosomes scanning from uORF1. When the active form of eIF-2 is present at high levels, reinitiation appears to be much more efficient at uORF4 than at GCN4 when each is located very close to uORF1. Under conditions of reduced recycling of eIF-2, reinitiation at uORF4 is substantially suppressed, which allows ribosomes to reach the GCN4 start site; in contrast, reinitiation at GCN4 in constructs lacking uORF4 is unaffected by decreasing the level of eIF-2 activity. This last finding raises the possibility that time-dependent binding to ribosomes of a second factor besides the eIF-2-GTP-Met-tRNA(iMet) ternary complex is rate limiting for reinitiation at GCN4. Moreover, our results show that the efficiency of translational reinitiation can be strongly influenced by the nature of the downstream cistron as well as the intercistronic distance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document