Covering-Over and Over-Reflecting During Residency Training: Using Personal and Professional Development Groups to Integrate Dysfunctional Modes of Being

1989 ◽  
pp. 87-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Addison
Author(s):  
Shala Cunningham ◽  
Bini Litwin ◽  
Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez ◽  
Jennifer Canbek

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e39-55
Author(s):  
Justin Hall ◽  
Reza Mirza ◽  
James Quinlan ◽  
Evan Chong ◽  
Karen Born ◽  
...  

Background: Resident doctors are integral to healthcare delivery in Canada. Engaging residents in resource stewardship is important for professional development, but also as they are drivers of healthcare resource use. To date, no national resident-specific resource stewardship guideline has been developed. Resident Doctors of Canada (RDoC) in collaboration with Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) sought to develop an evidence-informed, consensus-based list of five recommendations to promote resource stewardship.                  Methods: RDoC convened a taskforce with diverse geographic and specialty representation to develop candidate recommendations targeting resident resource stewardship behaviours using a consensus-based process, supported by a literature review. Residents across the country provided feedback on the candidate recommendations via an online questionnaire. The taskforce used this feedback to finalize the list.Results: The taskforce prepared 28 candidate recommendations for consideration. A detailed literature review and consensus process narrowed this list to 12 candidate recommendations for consultation. A total of 754 residents (754/10,068 residents = 7.5%) representing all provinces and levels of residency training reviewed and ranked the candidate recommendations. The highest-ranked recommendations comprised the final list.Conclusion: Resident doctors are willing and able to demonstrate leadership in advancing resource stewardship by the development of a national resident-specific list of Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1171-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Anthony Hawkins ◽  
Kristin Watson ◽  
Lydia C. Newsom

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun-Ming Chan ◽  
Jun-Te Hsu ◽  
Chun-Nan Yeh ◽  
Ta-Sen Yeh ◽  
Wei-Chen Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Traditionally, surgical residency training is more focused on obtaining surgical skills through a well-established coaching system worldwide. However, constant advances in medical science require surgeons to learn not only surgical skills but also the ability of scientific research to improve clinical practice and future professional development. The study aims to emphasize that professional education in terms of scientific research is also significant for surgical residency training. Methods All residents who entered the surgery residency program of the Department of Surgery in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between years 2006 and 2015 were evaluated in the study. Generally, every resident is assigned to a mentor since the first year of residency. Then, the mentor would help the resident qualify a two-step evaluation in terms of scientific research during the residency training program. Results A total of 193 residents were evaluated in the study. All of them had completed the first step regarding oral presentation of their designated research, and the majority of residents obtained 80–90 points that were rated by referees. Overall, 102 residents (52.8%) had completed the second step with the publication of a research manuscript. The percentage of residents who had fulfilled the criteria of this two-step assessment ranged from 35.3–81.8% by year. Conclusions Surgical training has become more complex and challenging for residents nowadays. The continuing education for surgical residents should not be limited in coaching clinical practice. Scientific research is also essential for current surgical residency training, and a formal mentorship program may be beneficial for the future professional development of surgical residents.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 134-134
Author(s):  
Michael S. Cookson ◽  
Sam S. Chang ◽  
S. Duke Herrell ◽  
Joseph A. Smith

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document