scholarly journals Final States in Charmed Particle Decays

Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Rosner
1975 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2744-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pais ◽  
S. B. Treiman

1979 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.G. Körner ◽  
Gary R. Goldstein

1977 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Peshkin ◽  
Jonathan L. Rosner

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 856-870
Author(s):  
A. I. Zinchenko ◽  
S. N. Igolkin ◽  
V. P. Kondratiev ◽  
Yu. A. Murin

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2390-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pais ◽  
S. B. Treiman

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 05008
Author(s):  
X. Sun ◽  
E. Adamek ◽  
B. Allgeier ◽  
M. Blatnik ◽  
T.J. Bowles ◽  
...  

In January, 2018, Fornal and Grinstein proposed that a previously unobserved neutron decay branch to a dark matter particle (χ) could account for the discrepancy in the neutron lifetime observed in two different types of experiments. One of the possible final states discussed includes a single χ along with an e+e− pair. We use data from the UCNA (Ultracold Neutron Asymmetry) experiment to set limits on this decay channel. Coincident electron-like events are detected with ∼ 4π acceptance using a pair of detectors that observe a volume of stored Ultracold Neutrons (UCNs). We use the timing information of coincidence events to select candidate dark sector particle decays by applying a timing calibration and selecting events within a physically-forbidden timing region for conventional n → p + e- + ν̅e decays. The summed kinetic energy (Ee+e−) from such events is reconstructed and used to set limits, as a function of the χ mass, on the branching fraction for this decay channel.


1978 ◽  
Vol 73 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 433-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.R. Rubinstein ◽  
L. Stodolsky ◽  
F. Wagner ◽  
U. Wolff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document