Pretrial Release Decisions

Author(s):  
Michael R. Gottfredson ◽  
Don M. Gottfredson
Keyword(s):  
1977 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 749
Author(s):  
Neal A. Milner ◽  
Paul B. Wice

Author(s):  
John S. Goldkamp ◽  
Michael R. Gottfredson ◽  
Peter R. Jones ◽  
Doris Weiland
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John S. Goldkamp ◽  
Michael R. Gottfredson ◽  
Peter R. Jones ◽  
Doris Weiland

Author(s):  
John S. Goldkamp ◽  
Michael R. Gottfredson ◽  
Peter R. Jones ◽  
Doris Weiland

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 41-70
Author(s):  
Stephen Rispoli

Texas’s current prison population consists of far more pretrial detainees than convicted criminals. Despite United States and Texas constitutional protections, the default rule in many jurisdictions, including Texas, detains misdemeanor and non-violent felony defendants unless they can post a monetary bond or get a surety to post the bond for them (“bail bond”) to obtain their release. Most pretrial detainees remain detained due not to their alleged dangerousness, but rather because they simply cannot afford to post bail (or get someone to post it for them). As a result, many pretrial detainees find themselves choosing between hamstringing their financial future or remaining in detention until trial. If Americans are serious about “honoring the presumption of innocence,” we must reform the way that misdemeanor and non-violent felony defendants are treated while awaiting trial. Rather than treat them as guilty and keep them in jail unless they can pay for their release, the standard should be to release them unless there is a very good reason for not doing so. By changing the default option from pretrial detention to pretrial release, many Texas judges will be more pre-disposed to release misdemeanor and non-violent felony defendants on conditions other than the posting of monetary bail. This switch will result in fewer people being detained simply because they cannot afford to be released—which will prevent adverse economic consequences to already disadvantaged citizens. Proposed reform has been discussed for decades. Reforming the bail system in Texas is a current, critical need. This criminal justice issue undermines the public’s faith in our system of justice and detrimentally affects the economic and social status of countless citizens who will ultimately be found not guilty. Doing nothing weakens our overall rule-of-law system and ultimately erodes the foundation upon which our society is built.


1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-222
Author(s):  
James G. Carr

Author(s):  
Gregory A. Frost

Computer applications for conducting complex spatial analysis of crime data are widely used by law enforcement agencies. By combining sophisticated geographic information systems with global positioning satellite tracking devices, a new tool is emerging that will remove the criminal anonymity of probationers, parolees and offenders on pretrial release. Every year, an ever-increasing number of offenders are set free on either probation or parole within our nation’s communities. As the number of offenders on our streets grows, the need for the criminal justice system to hold these offenders accountable and exert some level of control also increases. Florida’s Electronic Monitoring Protection and Crime Tracking (EMPACT) project is breaking new ground in an effort to use technology as an effective way to remove the anonymity of crime. Through the automated correlation of GPS tracking data and local crime incident data, participating criminal justice agencies are able to determine if a tracked offender was at the scene of a crime when it occurred. In addition, because EMPACT uses a Web-based interface, participating agencies also have access to each other’s data. This creates a crime-mapping environment where crime analysts and investigators have the opportunity to evaluate, at the click of a button, multi-jurisdictional crime patterns and offender track data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document