High-Resolution Manometry and Assessment of Esophageal Reflux

2015 ◽  
pp. 107-126
Author(s):  
Mary K. Rude ◽  
C. Prakash Gyawali
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Galdino Riva ◽  
Stefano Siboni ◽  
Marco Sozzi ◽  
Veronica Lazzari ◽  
Emanuele Asti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S291
Author(s):  
Enrique Coss-Adame ◽  
Villar-Chavez Alicia Sofia ◽  
Jose M. Remes Troche ◽  
Enmanuel R. Espinal Gomez ◽  
Paulo Cesar Gomez-Castaños

2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. S-421
Author(s):  
Mentore Ribolsi ◽  
Paola Balestrieri ◽  
Maria Chiara Addarii ◽  
Sara Emerenziani ◽  
Michele Cicala

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Máté Csucska ◽  
Balázs Kovács ◽  
Lilla Ozorai ◽  
Árpád Patai ◽  
Zoltán Lóderer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Fundoplication is a well accepted method in treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. High Resolution Manometry (HRM) is essential in diagnosis of functional esophageal diseases. The aim of our study was to find the place and value of HRM after 6 months of Toupet-fundoplication, and find correlation in symptoms remained, if any. Methods In 2016–2017 98 Toupet-fundoplications were performed by single surgeon. Surgeries were after HRM, EGD and pre-operative reflux symptom questionnaire performed in our Esophageal Center. Six months after surgery EGD, HRM and post-operative symptom questionnaire was planned to manage in each patients. Results Until Feb/01/2018 74/98 patients were more than 6 months after their operation. 72/74 patients completed the questionnaire and the EGD as well. 28/72 patients absolved HRM also. 25/28 patients had no complains and pre-operative symptoms relieved completely requiring neither PPI nor H2 blockers. 2/28 patients had gastric emptying problems, and 1/28 had moderate reflux associated symptom. Compared to that 22/28 patients HRM verified abnormal values mostly in DCI, however these 22 patients were asymptomatic. It has to be mentioned that DCI was better pre-operatively than post-operatively in 12 out of 22 cases. Conclusion Post-operative HRM can qualify and describe the wrap objectively (its location and basic pressure) however the latest Chicago-criteria was not developed for after-surgery states. We can conclude that post-operative routine HRM can mislead the physician, has importance only in patients with significant complains. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document