The Law and Psychology of Bullying

2019 ◽  
pp. 197-234
Author(s):  
Lyndsay N. Jenkins ◽  
Michelle Kilpatrick Demaray ◽  
Nicole B. Dorio ◽  
Morgan Eldridge
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 701-702
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Lyon

Author(s):  
Christine M Lillie ◽  
Brock Knapp ◽  
Lasana T. Harris ◽  
Richard Ashby Wilson

2021 ◽  
pp. 117-148
Author(s):  
Arden Rowell ◽  
Kenworthey Bilz

This chapter addresses what general law and psychology have to say that may be helpful to environmental law, as they are in other areas of law. It addresses what law and psychology can tell us about getting people to change their attitudes and their behaviors—when attempts to change might work, when they might fail, and why. The chapter addresses persuasion, motivation (with an emphasis on motivated cognition), cognition, and social influence. In each category, the chapter first describes the broad strokes of the psychological research, before giving examples of how it might be used to understand the law generally, and environmental law more particularly.


Teisė ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Viktoras Justickis ◽  
Gintautas Danišauskas

Straipsnyje nagrinėjamos priežastys, kurios trukdo plačiau panaudoti teisėje psichologijos žinias. Apibendrinami dabartiniai teisės priešinimosi plačiau taikyti psichologijos žinias aiškinimai. Parodoma, kad bendras visų šių aiškinimų pagrindas yra teisės ir psichologijos žinių nesuderinamumas, kylantis iš esminių šių dviejų mokslų skirtybių. Atliekama kritinė teisės ir psichologijos nesuderinamumo idėjos analizė. Siūlomas alternatyvus minėto fenomeno aiškinimas. Tuo pagrindu nagrinėjami teisės priešinimosi psichologijos žinioms įveikos būdai ir platesnio psichologijos taikymo teisėje perspektyvos.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Hunter McDonnell ◽  
Janice Nadler ◽  
Loran Nordgren
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
pp. 39-55
Author(s):  
William S. Laufer ◽  
Steven D. Walt
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document