scholarly journals Causal Inference by String Diagram Surgery

Author(s):  
Bart Jacobs ◽  
Aleks Kissinger ◽  
Fabio Zanasi
Author(s):  
Bart Jacobs ◽  
Aleks Kissinger ◽  
Fabio Zanasi

Abstract Extracting causal relationships from observed correlations is a growing area in probabilistic reasoning, originating with the seminal work of Pearl and others from the early 1990s. This paper develops a new, categorically oriented view based on a clear distinction between syntax (string diagrams) and semantics (stochastic matrices), connected via interpretations as structure-preserving functors. A key notion in the identification of causal effects is that of an intervention, whereby a variable is forcefully set to a particular value independent of any prior propensities. We represent the effect of such an intervention as an endo-functor which performs ‘string diagram surgery’ within the syntactic category of string diagrams. This diagram surgery in turn yields a new, interventional distribution via the interpretation functor. While in general there is no way to compute interventional distributions purely from observed data, we show that this is possible in certain special cases using a calculational tool called comb disintegration. We demonstrate the use of this technique on two well-known toy examples: one where we predict the causal effect of smoking on cancer in the presence of a confounding common cause and where we show that this technique provides simple sufficient conditions for computing interventions which apply to a wide variety of situations considered in the causal inference literature; the other one is an illustration of counterfactual reasoning where the same interventional techniques are used, but now in a ‘twinned’ set-up, with two version of the world – one factual and one counterfactual – joined together via exogenous variables that capture the uncertainties at hand.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto A. Gulli

Abstract The long-enduring coding metaphor is deemed problematic because it imbues correlational evidence with causal power. In neuroscience, most research is correlational or conditionally correlational; this research, in aggregate, informs causal inference. Rather than prescribing semantics used in correlational studies, it would be useful for neuroscientists to focus on a constructive syntax to guide principled causal inference.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Magnotti ◽  
Wei Ji Ma ◽  
Michael S. Beauchamp

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-234
Author(s):  
John H. Hitchcock ◽  
◽  
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie ◽  
Shannon David ◽  
Anne-Maree Ruddy ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kweku A. Opoku-Agyemang
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document