scholarly journals Determinants of Cross-Border M&As and Shareholder Wealth Effects in a Globalized World

Author(s):  
Eugene Nivorozhkin
Author(s):  
Svetlana Grigorieva ◽  
R. Morkovin

Svetlana A. Grigorieva National Research University The Higher School of Economics [email protected] The topic devoted to cross-border M&A performance has received wide attention in academic literature.Most existing studies examine wealth effects of international M&As in developed countries. Wecontribute to existing research by examining the market reaction to the announcements of M&As initiatedby companies from BRICS countries over 2000–2012. We assess the long-term performance ofM&A deals along with the short-term one and provide a copmarative analysis of company wealth gainsin cross-border and domestic M&As. Based on the sample of 117 cross-border deals and 247 domesticM&As we find that the stock market reacts favorably and statistically significant to the announcementsof domestic deals in the short run. Returns to foreign acquirer shareholders are also positive and statisticallysignificant. Comparing the effects of M&As on firm value in the short term for foreign anddomestic acquisitions we reveal that the latter outperform the cross-border M&As. Our analysis basedon the buy-and-hold abnormal return method shows the opposite result. We also find that the crossborderM&A deals increase the downside risk level of acquirers in the long term. According to ouranalysis, the key determinants of short- and long-term performance of M&A deals are the acquirer’sFCFF, percentage change in the acquiring country’s exchange rate against the target country currencyduring the acquisition year, and the level of international diversification of acquirers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-105
Author(s):  
Won Young Chae ◽  
Jinho Byun ◽  
Paul Moon Sub Choi ◽  
Ruilin Yang

The Chinese market for corporate control has recently gained much academic attention. This research constructs a sample of 159 cross-border acquisitions made by 123 Chinese firms between 2010 and 2014 and relates the roles of governance and culture to the wealth effects of mergers. First, the shareholders of Chinese bidders experience gains upon the announcement of overseas mergers. Second, country- and firm-level governance notably affects the cumulative abnormal returns of Chinese acquirers. Lastly, and however, the cultural distance per Hofstede’s (1980) four cultural dimensions does not appear to be a significant factor in determining the shareholder wealth of Chinese purchasers.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bülent Aybar ◽  
Wendy M. Jeffus ◽  
John C. Edmunds

This article examines the shareholder wealth effects for foreign companies that announce acquisitions of financial institutions in Latin America. We examine data for 636 transactions for the period 1985–2009. We employ event study methodology coupled with a cross-sectional regression to determine if shareholders of the acquiring firm receive positive returns. The results indicate that acquirers receive positive returns when the acquisition involves a target bank in a market with low market access, high market risk, and greater control post acquisition. These findings offer improvements on previously examined variables and provide insight into a market not sufficiently examined in prior research.


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-67
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Rosser ◽  
Jean M. Canil

This study examines interactions between pre-award ESOP restrictive conditions and award discounts/premiums that characterized executive stock option awards in Australia from the mid-1980s to 2000. Shareholder wealth effects at award suggest that (i) shareholders generally do not gain from offering discounts because associated value increments do not exceed the cost of the discount, (ii) premium awards coupled with exercise restrictions appear to be used to ameliorate the risk of CEO opportunism associated with irregular awards, and (iii) shareholders suffer a wealth decrement when premium awards are used to ameliorate the disinvestment incentive of inferior CEO dilution protection. The second of these findings implies risk of CEO opportunism. A major implication is that award discounts/premiums are used to modify the conditions of pre-existing ESOPs that presumably are dated and no longer optimal for addressing current incentive problems. Analyses of the optimality of award discounts/premiums should take this into account.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Tampakoudis ◽  
Michail Nerantzidis ◽  
Demetres Subeniotis ◽  
Apostolos Soutsas ◽  
Nikolaos Kiosses

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the wealth implications of bank mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in the unique Greek setting given the triple crisis phenomenon – banking, sovereign debt and economic crises – that prevailed after the global financial crisis. Design/methodology/approach The study examines bank M&As and bank transactions over the period from 1997 to 2018, as well as government-assisted M&As during the crisis. The wealth effects of bank M&As are assessed using both univariate and multivariate frameworks. Findings Findings show a neutral crisis effect on the valuation of M&As upon their announcement. However, the authors provide conclusive evidence that M&A completions are value-destroying events for acquiring banks during the crisis, far worse than in the pre-crisis period. Greek banks also fail to create value from government-assisted mergers. The results suggest that the financial stability and the prevention of further deepening of the Greek crisis with possible contagion effects were achieved at the expense of shareholders and taxpayers. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that examines the impact of the Greek triple crisis on the wealth effects of bank M&As and bank transactions. Also, the study provides first evidence with regard to the economic impact of government-assisted M&As in the European context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document