Pediatric Epilepsy

Author(s):  
Marc A. Prablek ◽  
Nisha Giridharan ◽  
Howard L. Weiner
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 177-185
Author(s):  
Natalie Guido-Estrada ◽  
Shifteh Sattar

AbstractThere is scarce evidence in review of the available literature to support a clear and superior model for the transition of care for epilepsy patients from pediatric to adult centers. Anecdotally, there is a common perception that families are reluctant to make this change and that the successful transition of care for epilepsy can be a challenge for patients, families, and physicians. As part of the effort to prepare the patient and family for the adult model of care, several treatment issues should be addressed. In this article, we discuss the specific challenges for physicians in transition of care for epilepsy patients from a pharmacological standpoint, which include differences in metabolism and pharmacodynamics that can impact tolerability or efficacy of antiepileptic medications, lifestyle changes affecting medication compliance and seizure control, acquired adult health conditions necessitating new medications that may result in adverse drug interactions, and adult neurologists' potential lack of familiarity with certain medications typically used in the pediatric epilepsy population. We offer this as a guide to avoid one of the many possible pitfalls when epilepsy patients transition to adult care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-101
Author(s):  
Ronnie E. Baticulon ◽  
Michael C. Dewan ◽  
Nunthasiri Wittayanakorn ◽  
Philipp R. Aldana ◽  
Wirginia J. Maixner

OBJECTIVEThere are limited data on the pediatric neurosurgical workforce in Asia and Australasia. The training and clinical practice of pediatric neurosurgeons need to be characterized in order to identify gaps in knowledge and skills, thereby establishing a framework from which to elevate pediatric neurosurgical care in the region.METHODSAn online survey for pediatric neurosurgeons was created in REDCap (Research Electronic Database Capture), collecting demographic information and data on pediatric neurosurgical training and clinical practice. The link to answer the survey was sent to the mailing lists of the Asian Australasian Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery and the Japanese Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, disseminated during the 2019 Asian Australasian Pediatric Neurosurgery Congress, and spread through social media. The survey was open to neurosurgeons who operated on patients ≤ 18 years old in Asian Australasian countries, whether or not they had completed fellowship training in pediatric neurosurgery. Descriptive statistics were computed and tabulated. Data were stratified and compared based on surgeon training and World Bank income group.RESULTSA total of 155 valid survey responses were analyzed, representing neurosurgeons from 21 countries. A total of 107 (69%) considered themselves pediatric neurosurgeons, of whom 66 (43%) had completed pediatric neurosurgery training. Neurosurgeons in East Asia commonly undergo a fellowship in their home countries, whereas the rest train mostly in North America, Europe, and Australia. A majority (89%) had operating privileges, and subspecialty pediatric training usually lasted from 6 months to 2 years. On average, trained pediatric neurosurgeons perform a higher number of pediatric neurosurgical operations per year compared with nonpediatric-trained respondents (131 ± 129 vs 56 ± 64 [mean ± SD], p = 0.0001). The mean number of total neurosurgical operations per year is similar for both groups (184 ± 129 vs 178 ± 142 [mean ± SD], p = 0.80). Respondents expressed the desire to train further in pediatric epilepsy, spasticity, vascular malformations, craniofacial disorders, and brain tumors.CONCLUSIONSBoth pediatric and general neurosurgeons provide neurosurgical care to children in Asia and Australasia. There is a need to increase pediatric neurosurgery fellowship programs in the region. Skill sets and training needs in pediatric neurosurgery vary depending on the country’s economic status and between pediatric-trained and nonpediatric-trained surgeons.


Author(s):  
Lorenzo Ricci ◽  
Eleonora Tamilia ◽  
Michel Alhilani ◽  
Aliza Alter ◽  
Μ. Scott Perry ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 088307382110195
Author(s):  
Sabrina Pan ◽  
Alan Wu ◽  
Mark Weiner ◽  
Zachary M Grinspan

Introduction: Computable phenotypes allow identification of well-defined patient cohorts from electronic health record data. Little is known about the accuracy of diagnostic codes for important clinical concepts in pediatric epilepsy, such as (1) risk factors like neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; (2) clinical concepts like treatment resistance; (3) and syndromes like juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. We developed and evaluated the performance of computable phenotypes for these examples using electronic health record data at one center. Methods: We identified gold standard cohorts for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, pediatric treatment-resistant epilepsy, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy via existing registries and review of clinical notes. From the electronic health record, we extracted diagnostic and procedure codes for all children with a diagnosis of epilepsy and seizures. We used these codes to develop computable phenotypes and evaluated by sensitivity, positive predictive value, and the F-measure. Results: For neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, the best-performing computable phenotype (HIE ICD-9 /10 and [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or electroencephalography (EEG) within 120 days of life] and absence of commonly miscoded conditions) had high sensitivity (95.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85-99), positive predictive value (100%, 95% CI 95-100), and F measure (0.98). For treatment-resistant epilepsy, the best-performing computable phenotype (3 or more antiseizure medicines in the last 2 years or treatment-resistant ICD-10) had a sensitivity of 86.9% (95% CI 79-93), positive predictive value of 69.6% (95% CI 60-79), and F-measure of 0.77. For juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, the best performing computable phenotype (JME ICD-10) had poor sensitivity (52%, 95% CI 43-60) but high positive predictive value (90.4%, 95% CI 81-96); the F measure was 0.66. Conclusion: The variable accuracy of our computable phenotypes (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy high, treatment resistance medium, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy low) demonstrates the heterogeneity of success using administrative data to identify cohorts important for pediatric epilepsy research.


2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (26) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sanjiv Bhatia ◽  
John Ragheb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document