IntroductionIn Germany a consistent, performance-oriented, flat-rate remuneration system based on per-day payments for inpatient and day patient hospital services for psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities (PEPP) is developed. The Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH decided in 2013 to participate in the optional PEPP introducing phase and acts as a PEPP cost accounting hospital.ObjectivesDue to a controversial discussion by the psychiatric experts, an adjustment of the hitherto only performance-based to a budget-oriented system based on PEPP is planned in 2017.AimsThis paper discusses if the current PEPP remuneration system enables an appropriate recognition and measurement of services.MethodsDescriptive analyses were performed by comparing inpatient and day patient treatment at a therapy oriented psychiatric unit and the emergency psychiatric unit in 2015. The evaluation primarily focused on the criteria of “staffing level and structure”, “imaging of services by German procedure classification (OPS) according to PEPP”, “PEPP remuneration”.ResultsOur findings (Table 1) show that in 2015 the PEPP remuneration system provided an appropriate recognition of unit-specific services in emergency psychiatry (e.g., 1 to 1 care, intensive care treatment), but services of board certified therapeutic staff were recognized inadequately in consequence of the definition of therapy by the OPS catalogue.ConclusionFurther development of payment system should implicate changes in the definition of therapy according to scientific guidelines and the pay for performance concept.Table 1Disclosure of interestActivity as a speaker, Janssen-Cilag GmbH.
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency psychiatry-Millcreek community hospital, Erie, PA
