Asset-Level Physical Climate Risk Disclosure

2020 ◽  
pp. 67-80
Author(s):  
Natalie Ambrosio Preudhomme ◽  
Emilie Mazzacurati
Keyword(s):  
Auditor ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
S. Puchkova ◽  
Yu. Sotneva

The article focuses on the sustainable development initiatives and sustainable development standards, which are the bases of information-analytic analysis, helping investors to understand the IFRS’ role in climate risk disclosure and other sustainable development risks.


Author(s):  
Hill and

This chapter looks at how more transparent disclosure of climate risks can make markets work for resilience. In a world in which climate risk is reflected in the prices of assets traded in the market, everyone will be pressured to manage the risk and protect the value of their holdings. This chapter looks at four markets where we might expect climate risk disclosure to cause prices to change most readily: equities (company stocks), debt (bonds issued by companies and governments), property (real estate), and insurance. It argues that disclosure and better risk information can propel climate resilience at a systemic level, but it can also prove highly disruptive. Fear of disruption and its consequences has led different groups to throw sand into the gears to delay a day of reckoning, but that day is coming. If communities are unprepared, investors, banks, and insurance companies could panic and pull back indiscriminately from parts of the stock, bond, property, and insurance markets. The insights learned from these markets can illustrate how each could drive resilience on a large scale.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
David South ◽  
Kaitlyn Zolton ◽  
Andy Trump

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sônia Gomes ◽  
Daniel Koui ◽  
Adriano Bruni ◽  
Nverson Oliveira

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Esmeralda Colombo

Abstract The year 2020 proved to be a clarion call for global society. There is no longer doubt that increasingly we are experiencing unpredictable events, known as ‘black swans’, ranging from pandemics to financial meltdowns. One of the ’climate black swans’ against which experts have cautioned is the financial crisis caused by climate change. In this context, the Australian case of McVeigh v. Retail Employees Superannuation Trust for the first time tested climate risk and the fiduciary duties of retail pension funds. Settled in November 2020, the case has already raised the bar for climate risk practice in pension funds. In particular, McVeigh suggests that courts, as well as out-of-court settlements, may articulate a duty, rather than grant permission, for pension funds to consider climate-related financial risk in their investment decisions. The article builds on McVeigh to ask two questions. Firstly, what is the role of climate change litigation in promoting climate regulation by pension funds? Secondly, what is the relative importance of pension funds for the risk management of climate-related financial risk via due diligence compared with risk assessment via disclosure? Fundamentally, the article explains climate-related financial risk as a cultural phenomenon and argues that a discussion on pension fund fiduciary duties must consider disclosure in addition to due diligence. It argues that McVeigh articulated the need for a normative approach to pension fund disclosure duties and an extension of the field of climate-related risk disclosure to embrace climate-related risk due diligence.


Nature Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Griffin ◽  
Amy Myers Jaffe
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 791-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kouloukoui ◽  
Ângelo Marcio Oliveira Sant'Anna ◽  
Sônia Maria da Silva Gomes ◽  
Marcia Mara de Oliveira Marinho ◽  
Pieter de Jong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emirhan Ilhan ◽  
Philipp Krueger ◽  
Zacharias Sautner ◽  
Laura T. Starks

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document