The Incarcerating Biceps Tendon

2021 ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Helen S. Zitkovsky ◽  
Claire D. Eliasberg ◽  
Justin T. Maas ◽  
Samuel A. Taylor ◽  
Stephen J. O’Brien
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon

Return to Sport and Weightlifting Analysis Following Distal Biceps Tendon Repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Joseph N. Liu ◽  
Bhargavi Maheshwer ◽  
Grant H. Garcia ◽  
Edward C. Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Distal Biceps Tendon ◽  
Distal Biceps ◽  
Biceps Tendon Repair

scholarly journals A partial articular‐sided supraspinatus tear caused by the biceps tendon: A novel etiology of internal impingement

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Rosinski ◽  
James L. Chen ◽  
Patrick J. McGahan
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Internal Impingement ◽  
Supraspinatus Tear

scholarly journals SLAP Tears

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263502542110007
Author(s):  
Steven B. Cohen ◽  
John R. Matthews
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Slap Repair ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Labral Tears ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Background: Superior labral tears are frequently encountered during shoulder arthroscopy. Outcomes following superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) repairs in young athletes have been well documented. Superior labral repairs in older patient population continue to remain controversial due to concerns of postoperative complications including persistent preoperative symptoms, pain, stiffness, and higher rates of revision surgery. Indications: We present a case of a highly active 38-year-old woman who failed 1½ years of nonoperative management of a type IIB SLAP tear with extension to the posterior labrum. Her symptoms continued to limit her hobbies and work. Technique: A knotless single-anchor SLAP repair was performed along with debridement of the posterior frayed labrum. No biceps tenotomy or tenodesis was performed after full evaluation of the tendon failed to demonstrate evidence of synovitis, tendinopathy, or tear. The patient also did not have any concomitant shoulder pathology, including a rotator cuff tear or chondral lesion. Results: At 6 months, the patient had regained full range of motion similar to the contralateral side. She had returned to her normal activities and sports, including tennis. Discussion/Conclusion: Successful outcomes following SLAP repairs in patients over 35 years can be achieved, but treatment should be individualized with particular attention to concomitant pathology involving the rotator cuff, chondral surface, or biceps tendon which may require tenodesis or tenotomy.

scholarly journals Measurements of Tendon Movement Within the Bicipital Groove After Suprapectoral Intra-articular Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097753
Author(s):  
Brian J. Kelly ◽  
Alan W. Reynolds ◽  
Patrick J. Schimoler ◽  
Alexander Kharlamov ◽  
Mark Carl Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Bicipital Groove ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Scapular Motion

Background: Lesions of the long head of the biceps can be successfully treated with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis when surgical management is elected. The advantage of a tenodesis is that it prevents the potential development of a cosmetic deformity or cramping muscle pain. Proponents of a subpectoral tenodesis believe that “groove pain” may remain a problem after suprapectoral tenodesis as a result of persistent motion of the tendon within the bicipital groove. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove before and after a suprapectoral intra-articular tenodesis. The hypothesis was that there would be minimal to no motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove after tenodesis. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the long head of the biceps tendon as well as the bicipital groove. Inclinometers and fiducials (optical markers) were used to measure the motions of the scapula, forearm, and biceps tendon through a full range of shoulder and elbow motions. A suprapectoral biceps tenodesis was then performed, and the motions were repeated. The motion of the biceps tendon was quantified as a function of scapular or forearm motion in each plane, both before and after the tenodesis. Results: There was minimal motion of the native biceps tendon during elbow flexion and extension but significant motion during all planes of scapular motion before tenodesis, with the most motion occurring during shoulder flexion-extension (20.73 ± 8.21 mm). The motion of the biceps tendon after tenodesis was significantly reduced during every plane of scapular motion compared with the native state ( P < .01 in all planes of motion), with a maximum motion of only 1.57 mm. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant reduction in motion of the biceps tendon in all planes of scapular motion after the intra-articular biceps tenodesis. The motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove was essentially eliminated after the suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Clinical Relevance: This arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis technique can significantly reduce motion of the biceps tendon within the groove in this cadaveric study, possibly reducing the likelihood of groove pain in the clinical setting.

scholarly journals The Role of Deadlifts in Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Ruptures: An Alternative Mechanism Described With YouTube Videos

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712199181
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kapicioglu ◽  
Emre Bilgin ◽  
Necip Guven ◽  
Anil Pulatkan ◽  
Kerem Bilsel
Keyword(s):  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Alternative Mechanism ◽  
Distal Biceps Tendon ◽  
Distal Biceps ◽  
Biceps Tendon Rupture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Biceps Brachii Tendon ◽  
Youtube Videos

Background: The classic injury mechanism of a distal biceps brachii tendon rupture (DBBTR) is eccentric loading to the flexed elbow when the forearm is supinated. Purpose: To determine alternative mechanisms of a DBBTR in powerlifting sports, particularly in deadlift competitions, with the use of YouTube videos. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: A search on YouTube was performed using the search terms “distal biceps tendon rupture” and “distal biceps tendon injury” combined with “competition,” “deadlift,” and “powerlifting.” The videos underwent an evaluation for accuracy by 3 surgeons according to predetermined criteria. Type of sports activity, participant sex, side of the injury, and arm positions at the time of the injury were recorded. Results: Among the videos reviewed, 35 injuries were found appropriate for an evaluation. All participants were male. The majority of the injuries (n = 25) were observed during the deadlift. Only in 1 deadlift injury were both forearms in supination. In the remaining deadlift injuries (n = 24), all elbows were in extension, with 1 forearm in supination and the other in pronation. Among the deadlift injuries in the mixed-grip position, all ruptures occurred in a supinated extremity: 25% (n = 6) of ruptures occurred on the right side, and 75% (n = 18) of ruptures occurred on the left side; this was a significant difference ( P = .014). Conclusion: We described an alternative mechanism for a DBBTR, namely, eccentric loading to an extended elbow when the forearm is supinated during the deadlift. As all the ruptures occurred in a supinated extremity, holding the bar with both forearms in pronation may prevent or decrease the risk of ruptures during the deadlift.

scholarly journals Plate Fixation for Irreducible Proximal Humeral Fractures in Children and Adolescents—A Single-Center Case Series of Six Patients

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 635
Author(s):  
Florian Freislederer ◽  
Susanne Bensler ◽  
Thomas Specht ◽  
Olaf Magerkurth ◽  
Karim Eid
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Proximal Humeral Fractures ◽  
Humeral Fractures ◽  
Constant Murley Score ◽  
Fractures In Children ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Conjoint Tendon

Background: Recommended treatment for severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in children is the closed reduction and percutaneous fixation by K-wires or intramedullary nailing. Methods: From January 2016 to January 2017 6, 21 children/adolescents (range 8 to 16 years) with proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically for severe displacement. In these six patients, several attempts of closed reduction were unsuccessful, and an open reduction was performed. The humeral head was fixed with a 3.5 mm T-plate without affecting the growth plate. Plate removal was performed at a mean interval of 132 days after initial surgery. Two years after initial surgery, the clinical outcome was assessed by the Constant–Murley score and QuickDASH score (including sport/music and work) and the shoulder joint was evaluated with a standardized sonographic examination for the rotator cuff and the conjoint tendon. Results: In all six patients, dorsal displacement of the fracture was irreducible due to the interposition of tendinous or osseous structures. Intraoperatively, the interposed structures were the long biceps tendon in two, periosteal tissue in two, a bony fragment in one, and the long biceps tendon together with the conjoint tendon in one case. At mean follow-up of 26 months (range 22 months to 29 months), patients showed very good clinical results with an excellent mean Constant–Murley score of 97.5 (range 91 to 100) and mean QuickDASH score (including sport/music and work) of 5.5 (range 0–20.8). An X-ray follow-up 6 weeks after surgery demonstrated early consolidation and correct alignment in all patients. A sonographic evaluation at 2 years post injury showed that the biceps and the conjoined tendon were intact in all patients. Conclusions: If a proximal humeral fracture is not reducible by closed means, a tissue entrapment (most likely biceps tendon) should be considered. Treatment with an open reduction and plate fixation yields very good clinical and radiological results and preserves interposed structures as the biceps and conjoint tendon.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic partial Superior Capsular Reconstruction using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon–Technique Description

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Barcellos Terra ◽  
Tannous Jorge Sassine ◽  
Benno Ejnisman ◽  
Alberto de Castro Pochini ◽  
Paulo Santoro Belangero
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction ◽  
Long Head

Distance of the Posterior Interosseous Nerve From the Bicipital (Radial) Tuberosity at Varying Positions of Forearm Rotation: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study With Clinical Implications

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1152-1159
Author(s):  
Tyler A. Luthringer ◽  
David A. Bloom ◽  
David S. Klein ◽  
Samuel L. Baron ◽  
Erin F. Alaia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Forearm Rotation ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
Biceps Tendon Repair ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bicipital Tuberosity

Background: The proximity of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) to the bicipital tuberosity is clinically important in the increasingly popular anterior single-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair. Maximal forearm supination is recommended during tendon reinsertion from the anterior approach to ensure the maximum protective distance of the PIN from the bicipital tuberosity. Purpose: To compare the location of the PIN on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relative to bicortical drill pin instrumentation for suspensory button fixation via the anterior single-incision approach in varying positions of forearm rotation. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Axial, non–fat suppressed, T1-weighted MRI scans of the elbow were obtained in positions of maximal supination, neutral, and maximal pronation in 13 skeletally mature individuals. Distances were measured from the PIN to (1) the simulated path of an entering guidewire (GWE-PIN) and (2) the cortical starting point of the guidewire on the bicipital tuberosity (CSP-PIN) achievable from the single-incision approach. To radiographically define the location of the nerve relative to constant landmarks, measurements were also made from the PIN to (3) the prominent-most point on the bicipital tuberosity (BTP-PIN) and (4) a perpendicular plane trajectory from the bicipital tuberosity exiting the opposing radial cortex (PPT-PIN). All measurements were subsequently compared between positions of pronation, neutral, and supination. In supination only, BTP-PIN and PPT-PIN measurements were made and compared at 3 sequential axial levels to evaluate the longitudinal course of the nerve relative to the bicipital tuberosity. Results: Of the 13 study participants, mean age was 38.77 years, and mean body mass index was 25.58. Five participants were female, and 5 left and 8 right elbow MRI scans were reviewed. The GWE-PIN was significantly greater in supination (mean ± SD, 16.01 ± 2.9 mm) compared with pronation (13.66 ± 2.5 mm) ( P < .005). The mean CSP-PIN was significantly greater in supination (16.20 ± 2.8 mm) compared with pronation (14.18 ± 2.4 mm) ( P < .013).The mean PPT-PIN was significantly greater in supination (9.00 ± 3.0 mm) compared with both pronation (1.96 ± 1.2 mm; P < .001) and neutral (4.73 ± 2.6 mm; P < .001). The mean BTP-PIN was 20.54 ± 3.0, 20.81 ± 2.7, and 20.35 ± 2.9 mm in pronation, neutral, and supination, respectively, which did not significantly differ between positions. In supination, the proximal, midportion, and distal measurements of BTP-PIN did not significantly differ. The proximal PPT-PIN distance (9.08 ± 2.9 mm) was significantly greater than midportion PPT-PIN (5.85 ± 2.4 mm; P < .001) and distal BTP-PIN (2.27 ± 1.8 mm; P < .001). Conclusion: This MRI study supports existing evidence that supination protects the PIN from the entering guidewire instrumentation during anterior, single-incision biceps tendon repair using cortical button fixation. The distances between the entering guidewire trajectory and PIN show that guidewire-inflicted injury to the nerve is unlikely during the anterior single-incision approach. Clinical Relevance: When a safe technique is used, PIN injuries during anterior repair are likely the result of aberrant retractor placement, and we recommend against the use of retractors deep to the radial neck. Guidewire placement as close as possible to the anatomic footprint of the biceps tendon is safe from the anterior approach. MRI evaluation confirms that ulnar and proximal guidewire trajectory is the safest technique when using single-incision bicortical suspensory button fixation.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using Autologous Fascia Lata and Biceps Tendon Augmentation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Heng Hsu ◽  
Chih-Hao Chiu ◽  
Chun-Jui Weng ◽  
Kuo-Yau Hsu ◽  
Yi-Sheng Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Fascia Lata ◽  
Superior Capsule Reconstruction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document