Atlas of Robotic Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery

2022 ◽  
Gut ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 965-965
Author(s):  
A G Johnson

Gut ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A53.1-A53 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Beamish ◽  
D S Y Chan ◽  
T D Reid ◽  
R Barlow ◽  
I Howell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Benzing ◽  
Helmut Weiss ◽  
Felix Krenzien ◽  
Matthias Biebl ◽  
Johann Pratschke ◽  
...  

Background. In laparoscopic upper-gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, an adequate retraction of the liver is crucial. Especially in single-port surgery and obese patients, problems may occur during liver retraction. The current study seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the LiVac trocar-free liver retractor in laparoscopic upper-GI surgery. Methods. The present study is a nonrandomized dual-center clinical series describing our preliminary results using the LiVac system for liver retraction. The primary end points of the present study included the effectiveness and safety of the LiVac device as well as complications and documentation of problems with the device during surgery. Results. The device was used in 11 patients for simple and complex laparoscopic procedures. The mean age of the study population was 59.6 years (SD = 20.6; range = 30-84). There were 6 female and 5 male patients with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 31.9 kg/m2 (SD = 8.1; range = 26.0-45.3). The efficacy of the device was excellent in all cases, reducing the number of trocars needed. There were no device-related complications. Conclusion. The LiVac liver retractor is easy to use and provides a good exposure of the operative field in upper-GI laparoscopic surgery, even in obese patients with a high BMI.


1999 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-278
Author(s):  
Jeffery M. Marks

Author(s):  
Juyong Cheong ◽  
Gregory Leighton Falk ◽  
Jigar Darji

Abstract Introduction: Postoperative complications after major upper gastrointestinal surgery can be devastating. Malnutrition has been found to be an important risk factor for postoperative complications. However, attempts at trying to detect malnourished patients preoperatively can be cumbersome and complex and are often not done. One simplified way of assessing nutritional status is the ANS system. The aim of this study was to show the relationship between ANS score and the postoperative outcome. Methodology: Medical record of all patients undergoing major EG and HB surgeries at Concord Hospital between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Results: 83 patients were operated and included (1) Whipples' procedure (20.5%), (2) total/subtotal gastrectomy (44.6%), (3) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (18%), and (4) distal pancreatectomy (14.5%). The mean ANS score was 1.58. Patients with higher ANS score (2 or more) were found to have significantly higher rates of wound infection (41% vs 12%, p<0.002), anastomotic leaks (13.7% vs 1.92%, p=0.034), unexpected return to operating theatre (31% vs 3.9%, p<0.001), slower return of bowel function as compared to patients with low ANS score (0 or 1). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the importance of screening for malnourished patients prior to their operation. Given its simplicity and effective predictive value, we recommend use of ANS system.


2021 ◽  
pp. 43-68
Author(s):  
Gozie Offiah ◽  
Arnold Hill

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
Ashley Hoi‐Man To ◽  
Patrick Ho‐Yu Chung ◽  
Michelle Yeuk‐Lam Tang ◽  
Kenneth Kak‐Yuen Wong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document