Community Detection in Bipartite Networks Using Random Walks

Author(s):  
Taher Alzahrani ◽  
Kathy J. Horadam ◽  
Serdar Boztas
Author(s):  
Mark Newman

An introduction to the mathematical tools used in the study of networks. Topics discussed include: the adjacency matrix; weighted, directed, acyclic, and bipartite networks; multilayer and dynamic networks; trees; planar networks. Some basic properties of networks are then discussed, including degrees, density and sparsity, paths on networks, component structure, and connectivity and cut sets. The final part of the chapter focuses on the graph Laplacian and its applications to network visualization, graph partitioning, the theory of random walks, and other problems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 128901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guolin Wu ◽  
Changgui Gu ◽  
Lu Qiu ◽  
Huijie Yang

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-Zheng Wang ◽  
Li Xiong ◽  
Hu-Chen Liu

Community detection is an important analysis task for complex networks, including bipartite networks, which consist of nodes of two types and edges connecting only nodes of different types. Many community detection methods take the number of communities in the networks as a fixed known quantity; however, it is impossible to give such information in advance in real-world networks. In our paper, we propose a projection-free Bayesian inference method to determine the number of pure-type communities in bipartite networks. This paper makes the following contributions: (1) we present the first principle derivation of a practical method, using the degree-corrected bipartite stochastic block model that is able to deal with networks with broad degree distributions, for estimating the number of pure-type communities of bipartite networks; (2) a prior probability distribution is proposed over the partition of a bipartite network; (3) we design a Monte Carlo algorithm incorporated with our proposed method and prior probability distribution. We give a demonstration of our algorithm on synthetic bipartite networks including an easy case with a homogeneous degree distribution and a difficult case with a heterogeneous degree distribution. The results show that the algorithm gives the correct number of communities of synthetic networks in most cases and outperforms the projection method especially in the networks with heterogeneous degree distributions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document