Plasma Waste Destruction

Author(s):  
Milan Hrabovsky ◽  
Izak Jacobus van der Walt
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna G. Talmy ◽  
James A. Zaykoski ◽  
Curtis A. Martin

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan A. Varela ◽  
Steven G. Oberg ◽  
Thomas M. Neustedter ◽  
Norvell Nelson

Fuel ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 1195-1207
Author(s):  
Estelle Desroches ◽  
Gérard Antonini

1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Timothy. Oppelt

1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-9) ◽  
pp. 1883-1899 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Leffrang ◽  
K. Ebert ◽  
K. Flory ◽  
U. Galla ◽  
H. Schnlieder

Author(s):  
Matt Tuck ◽  
Beth Wray ◽  
Mark Musgrave

A number of proven technologies applicable to the chemical and physical decontamination of radioactive and non-radioactive contaminants within the environmental remediation and radiological waste management sectors exist. Previous work generally acknowledges that these methods have limitations such as production of large volumes of waste, destruction of the substrate, complex safety considerations [1a] and application of special precautions to meet disposal acceptance criteria [2]. A method that removes a variety of contaminants from the surface and subsurface of porous materials, with minimal contaminated waste arisings, is highly desirable. TechXtract® is a patented, sequential chemical extraction process developed to remove radionuclides, PCBs, and other hazardous organic and inorganic substances from solid materials such as concrete, brick, steel, and exotic metals [3]. The technology uses multifarious task-specific chemical formulations and engineered applications to achieve surface penetration and removal of the contaminants from the atomic voids of metals and other substrates, or the capillaries and gel pores of concretes. TechXtract® is proven to remove a variety of contaminants from various substrates, allowing free release of the substrate as waste for disposal, or re-use, whilst producing minimal secondary waste. Data from testing of TechXtract’s capabilities and evidencing the technology’s efficacy during site based applied research and development is presented here.


1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Dalton ◽  
T.L. Harris ◽  
L.M. DeWitt

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
G.P Slabber ◽  
W.A Potgieter

Incineration of hazardous and medical (clinical) waste crepates an air pollution problem which s at the moment controlled in terms of the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act of 1965. It is exercised by officials from local authorities in accordance with part 3 of the Act and is very specialized. Consequently, officials from local authorities are not always trained to do this, especially at the smaller municipalities. Therefore, this function is dealt with in the wrong manner, or not dealt with at all. Incinirators are to be classified into three categories, namely incinirators where the refuse that is being burnt is also used as fuel or as supplementary fuel, incinerators which are not used for medical and hazardous waste destruction. If halogens like chlorine are present in teh waste, then there is a difinite possibility that dioxins and furans will be emitted during the incineration process. With a halogen content of more than 1% in the waste a minimum tempature of 1100 degree celsius for 2 senconds at the inner wall of the secondary chamber is imperative. For cytotoxic waste teh temperature must be at least 1000 degree celsius.


Chemosphere ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 587-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Ravera ◽  
Cesare Ciccarelli ◽  
Valentina Gianotti ◽  
Sonia Scorza ◽  
Domenico Osella

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document