Bacterial Determinants and Plant Defense Induction: Their Role as Biocontrol Agents in Sustainable Agriculture

2016 ◽  
pp. 187-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuti Patel ◽  
Riyaz Z. Sayyed ◽  
Meenu Saraf
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolás M. Cecchini ◽  
DeQuantarius J. Speed ◽  
Suruchi Roychoudhry ◽  
Jean T. Greenberg

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 9917
Author(s):  
Marika Pellegrini ◽  
Giancarlo Pagnani ◽  
Matteo Bernardi ◽  
Alessandro Mattedi ◽  
Daniela M. Spera ◽  
...  

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) afford plants several advantages (i.e., improvement of nutrient acquisition, growth, and development; induction of abiotic and biotic stress tolerance). Numerous PGPB strains have been isolated and studied over the years. However, only a few of them are available on the market, mainly due to the failed bacterial survival within the formulations and after application inside agroecosystems. PGPB strains with these challenging limitations can be used for the formulation of cell-free supernatants (CFSs), broth cultures processed through several mechanical and physical processes for cell removal. In the scientific literature there are diverse reviews and updates on PGPB in agriculture. However, no review deals with CFSs and the CFS metabolites obtainable by PGPB. The main objective of this review is to provide useful information for future research on CFSs as biostimulant and biocontrol agents in sustainable agriculture. Studies on CFS agricultural applications, both for biostimulant and biocontrol applications, have been reviewed, presenting limitations and advantages. Among the 109 articles selected and examined, the Bacillus genus seems to be the most promising due to the numerous articles that support its biostimulant and biocontrol potentialities. The present review underlines that research about this topic needs to be encouraged; evidence so far obtained has demonstrated that PGPB could be a valid source of secondary metabolites useful in sustainable agriculture.


2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. 310-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flor E. Acevedo ◽  
Michelle Peiffer ◽  
Swayamjit Ray ◽  
Robert Meagher ◽  
Dawn S. Luthe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Laura O. Marmolejo ◽  
Morgan N. Thompson ◽  
Anjel M. Helms

AbstractIn response to herbivory, plants emit volatile compounds that play important roles in plant defense. Herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) can deter herbivores, recruit natural enemies, and warn other plants of possible herbivore attack. Following HIPV detection, neighboring plants often respond by enhancing their anti-herbivore defenses, but a recent study found that herbivores can manipulate HIPV-interplant communication for their own benefit and suppress defenses in neighboring plants. Herbivores induce species-specific blends of HIPVs and how these different blends affect the specificity of plant defense responses remains unclear. Here we assessed how HIPVs from zucchini plants (Cucurbita pepo) challenged with different herbivore species affect resistance in neighboring plants. Volatile “emitter” plants were damaged by one of three herbivore species: saltmarsh caterpillars (Estigmene acrea), squash bugs (Anasa tristis), or striped cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum), or were left as undamaged controls. Neighboring “receiver” plants were exposed to HIPVs or control volatiles and then challenged by the associated herbivore species. As measures of plant resistance, we quantified herbivore feeding damage and defense-related phytohormones in receivers. We found that the three herbivore species induced different HIPV blends from squash plants. HIPVs induced by saltmarsh caterpillars suppressed defenses in receivers, leading to greater herbivory and lower defense induction compared to controls. In contrast, HIPVs induced by cucumber beetles and squash bugs did not affect plant resistance to subsequent herbivory in receivers. Our study shows that herbivore species identity affects volatile-mediated interplant communication in zucchini, revealing a new example of herbivore defense suppression through volatile cues.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estela Gimenez ◽  
Maria Salinas ◽  
Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document