scholarly journals Patch Based Synthesis of Whole Head MR Images: Application To EPI Distortion Correction

Author(s):  
Snehashis Roy ◽  
Yi-Yu Chou ◽  
Amod Jog ◽  
John A. Butman ◽  
Dzung L. Pham
NeuroImage ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 450-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper L.R. Andersson ◽  
Mark S. Graham ◽  
Ivana Drobnjak ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Nicola Filippini ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan M. Parra Robles ◽  
Evelio R. Gonzalez ◽  
Juan E. Paz ◽  
Nancy A. Alvarez Roca

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 2651-2661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan A Reinsberg ◽  
Simon J Doran ◽  
Elizabeth M Charles-Edwards ◽  
Martin O Leach

Author(s):  
Maysam Jafar ◽  
Sharon Giles ◽  
Veronica Morgan ◽  
Maria Schmidt ◽  
Martin O. Leach ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davis C. Woodworth ◽  
Whitney B. Pope ◽  
Linda M. Liau ◽  
Hyun J. Kim ◽  
Albert Lai ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1343-1361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon J Doran ◽  
Liz Charles-Edwards ◽  
Stefan A Reinsberg ◽  
Martin O Leach

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-410
Author(s):  
Katri Nousiainen ◽  
Teemu Mäkelä

Abstract Objective We aimed to develop a vendor-neutral and interaction-free quality assurance protocol for measuring geometric accuracy of head and brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. We investigated the usability of nonrigid image registration in the analysis and looked for the optimal registration parameters. Materials and methods We constructed a 3D-printed phantom and imaged it with 12 MR scanners using clinical sequences. We registered a geometric-ground-truth computed tomography (CT) acquisition to the MR images using an open-source nonrigid-registration-toolbox with varying parameters. We applied the transforms to a set of control points in the CT image and compared their locations to the corresponding visually verified reference points in the MR images. Results With optimized registration parameters, the mean difference (and standard deviation) of control point locations when compared to the reference method was (0.17 ± 0.02) mm for the 12 studied scanners. The maximum displacements varied from 0.50 to 1.35 mm or 0.89 to 2.30 mm, with vendors’ distortion correction on or off, respectively. Discussion Using nonrigid CT–MR registration can provide a robust and relatively test-object-agnostic method for estimating the intra- and inter-scanner variations of the geometric distortions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 25-26
Author(s):  
L. Vanquin ◽  
F. Crop ◽  
E. Rault ◽  
A. Wagner ◽  
R. Cayez ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 931 ◽  
pp. 012031 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Pappas ◽  
D. Dellios ◽  
I. Seimenis ◽  
A. Moutsatsos ◽  
E. Georgiou ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodor Stanescu ◽  
Hans-Sonke Jans ◽  
Keith Wachowicz ◽  
B. Gino Fallone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document