Aneurysm Treatment with Flow Diverters

Author(s):  
Brian P. Walcott ◽  
Ki-Eun Chang ◽  
Robin Babadjouni ◽  
William J. Mack
Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S36-S45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bree Chancellor ◽  
Eytan Raz ◽  
Maksim Shapiro ◽  
Omar Tanweer ◽  
Erez Nossek ◽  
...  

Abstract Flow diverters (FDs) have changed the management of brain aneurysms; not only for complex aneurysms (giant, fusiform and blister) refractory to conventional therapies, but also for unruptured lesions previously managed by traditional surgical or coil-based endovascular methods. Since 2011 when the PipelineTM Embolization Device (Medtronic) was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for adults with large or giant wide-neck intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery proximal to the posterior communicating segment, the role of flow diversion for aneurysm treatment has expanded—supported by favorably low complication and high cure rates compared with alternative treatments. Here we review the key clinical trials and the long term outcomes that have demonstrated safety and efficacy of minimized porosity endoluminal devices in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. E341-E342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Jabbour ◽  
Nohra Chalouhi

Author(s):  
A Nicholson ◽  
S Taylor ◽  
C Woods ◽  
J Cuoco ◽  
B Klein ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A57.1-A57
Author(s):  
A Puri ◽  
F Massari ◽  
S Hou ◽  
M Perras ◽  
C Brooks ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Herschel Wilde ◽  
Spencer Twitchell ◽  
Michael Karsy ◽  
Philipp Taussky ◽  
Ramesh Grandhi

Abstract INTRODUCTION Intracranial aneurysms represent a relatively common epidemiological problem, with a prevalence of 3% to 5% in the U.S. Surveillance and treatment remain costly enterprises especially with the advent of safer endovascular techniques, including coiling and pipeline embolization devices (PEDs). While a number of studies have evaluated aneurysm treatment cost, inclusion of follow-up costs had been limited. We sought to examine how follow-up costs after treatment could impact overall cost for different endovascular techniques. METHODS The value driven outcomes (VDO) database was used to evaluate the upfront and follow-up costs of electively treated patients who underwent coiling or PED for intracranial aneurysms from July 2011 to December 2017. RESULTS A total of 114 patients (n = 37 coiled, n = 77 PED) were included with no difference in age (61.3 ± 12.8 vs 57.0 ± 14.5 yr, P = .2), gender (males: 32.4% vs 22.1%, P = .2), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (P = .5), discharge disposition (P = .1), length of stay (3.1 ± 5.5 vs 2.4 ± 2.6 d, P = .2) or follow-up (22.7 ± 18.5 vs 18.6 ± 14.9 mo, P = .2). No differences in admission treatment (P = .5) or follow-up (P = .3) costs were seen for coiling or PED treatments. Initial costs were predominantly supplies/implants (56.1% vs 63.7%) for both coiling and PED. Follow-up costs were mostly facility costs (68.2% vs 67.5%) without differences in supplies/implants (10.5% vs 9.4%) or imaging (17.0% vs 17.8%) costs between coiling and PED. No differences in subgroup (eg, facility, supplies/implants, pharmacy, imaging, laboratory) costs were also observed. CONCLUSION These results suggested that coiling or PED could be used for aneurysm treatment in a cost-conscious manner when factoring both upfront and follow-up costs.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Basil E. Grüter ◽  
Lazar Tosic ◽  
Stefanos Voglis ◽  
Flavio Vasella ◽  
Valentino Mutschler ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Ever since the beginning of cerebral bypass surgery, the role of the bypass has been debated and indications have changed over the last 5 decades. This systematic literature research analysed all clinical studies on cerebral bypass that have been published from January 1959 to January 2020 for their year of publication, country of origin, citation index, role of and indication for bypass, bypass technique, revascularized territory, flow capacity, and title (for word cloud analysis per decade). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic literature research was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. All studies that have been published until January 1, 2020, were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 6,013 identified studies, 2,585 were included in the analysis. Of these, <i>n</i> = 1,734 (67%) studies addressed flow-augmentation bypass and <i>n</i> = 701 (27%) addressed flow-preservation bypass. The most common indication reported for flow augmentation is moyamoya (<i>n</i> = 877, 51%), followed by atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease (<i>n</i> = 753, 43%). For flow preservation, the most common indication is studies reporting on cerebral aneurysm surgery (<i>n</i> = 659, 94%). The increasing popularity of reporting on these bypass operations almost came to an end with the FDA approval of flow diverters for aneurysm treatment in 2011. Japan is the country with the most bypass studies (cumulatively published 933 articles), followed by the USA (630 articles) and China (232 articles). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Clinical studies on cerebral bypass surgery have become increasingly popular in the past decades. Since the introduction of moyamoya as a distinct pathologic entity, Asian countries in particular have a very active community regarding this disease, with an increasing number of articles published every year. Studies on bypass for chronic steno-occlusive disease peaked in the 1980s but have remained the main focus of bypass research, particularly in many European departments. The number of reports published on these bypass operations significantly decreased after the FDA approval of flow diverters for aneurysm treatment in 2011.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document