Emerging Israeli Perspectives and the Mediterranean Future: Grand Strategy and National Identity

2019 ◽  
pp. 139-150
Author(s):  
Eran Lerman
Hydrofictions ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 108-147
Author(s):  
Hannah Boast

This chapter examines the role that the Mediterranean Sea came to play in Israel’s national identity from the 1990s onwards. Through a reading of Amos Oz’s The Same Sea (1999), it counters claims that a turn to the Mediterranean offered a ‘post-ideological’ identity appropriate to the era of the Oslo Accords. It shows instead that the phenomenon of ‘Mediterraneanism’, or Yam Tikhoniut, was continuous with earlier Zionist goals, notably in reaffirming Israel’s affiliation with Europe and its distance from the ‘Orient’. Oz’s novel is further identified as depicting the arrival of global capitalism in Israel through its portrayals of tourism, and through its use of liquid metaphors and formal techniques that connect economic growth at home to underdevelopment abroad.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (261) ◽  
pp. 145-162
Author(s):  
Sébastien Quenot

AbstractThe policy of normalisation of the Corsican language carried out by Corsica’s institutions encounters the statute of languages in France, which supports the linguistic supremacy and monopoly of French in the public area. The vitality of Corsican underlined in the first general sociolinguistic survey makes it endangered even if a large majority of people support bilingualism and the project of co-officiality is approved by the Corsican Assembly. What are the main ways and results of public policy to save, revitalize and normalize the Corsican language in the context of the success of the assimilation of French minorities, a crisis of national identity in France, and cultural globalisation for a small population of 320,000 people who live on an island in the Mediterranean Sea?


Author(s):  
Frances Harris

The fourth chapter shows the Marlborough-Godolphin partnership challenged by Nottingham for control of grand strategy. The expansion of the war into Portugal, Spain, the Mediterranean, and the Americas makes Godolphin anxious about over-extension of resources. He also has to bring about the union of England with a violently nationalist Scotland to fulfil the queen’s desire and safeguard the Protestant succession. Marlborough is prevented by the Dutch from following up his success in the Low Countries and the Holy Roman Empire comes under threat from France. But Godolphin’s rigorous management of the Treasury gains the confidence of the City, thus lowering the interest rates for public credit, enabling him to pay subsidies to the Allies, exercise control over strategy, and fund Marlborough’s secret plan to save Vienna. With the aid of Robert Harley, Marlborough and Godolphin use the parliamentary contest over Occasional Conformity to divide the Tory opposition.


2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelio Espinosa

AbstractThis paper analyzes two imperial policies, the dynastic strategy of Charles V and the nationalist agenda of the Castilian clerical elite. The Protestant Reformation forced Charles to assess his priorities according to his conviction of religious unity and his dynastic claim of universal monarchy. Charles' ambitions compromised Spain's entrepreneurial agenda, which consisted of the defense of the Mediterranean against the Ottomans. Seeking to protect the coalescing transatlantic system and established commercial networks of Spanish businessmen, the Spanish administration under President Tavera (1524-1539) failed to convince Charles to focus on the Muslim enemy and to allow the German people to decide their own religious destinies. Instead, Charles sought to contain his universal monarchy in Europe, and his decision to restore religious unity in the empire resulted in the overextension of Spanish resources and the eventual decline of Spain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document