An Approach to Computational Complexity in Membrane Computing

Author(s):  
Mario J. Pérez-Jiménez
Author(s):  
Gheorghe Paun ◽  
Mario J. Perez-Jimenez

This chapter is a quick survey of spiking neural P systems, a branch of membrane computing which was recently introduced with motivation from neural computing based on spiking. Basic ideas, examples, some results (especially concerning the computing power and the computational complexity/efficiency), and several research topics are discussed. The presentation is succinct and informal, meant mainly to let the reader having a flavour of this research area. The additional references are an important source of information in this respect.


Author(s):  
Giancarlo Mauri ◽  
Alberto Leporati ◽  
Antonio E. Porreca ◽  
Claudio Zandron

Axioms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
David Orellana-Martín ◽  
Luis Valencia-Cabrera ◽  
Mario J. Pérez-Jiménez

A widely studied field in the framework of membrane computing is computational complexity theory. While some types of P systems are only capable of efficiently solving problems from the class P, adding one or more syntactic or semantic ingredients to these membrane systems can give them the ability to efficiently solve presumably intractable problems. These ingredients are called to form a frontier of efficiency, in the sense that passing from the first type of P systems to the second type leads to passing from non-efficiency to the presumed efficiency. In this work, a solution to the SAT problem, a well-known NP-complete problem, is obtained by means of a family of recognizer P systems with evolutional symport/antiport rules of length at most (2,1) and division rules where the environment plays a passive role; that is, P systems from CDEC^(2,1). This result is comparable to the one obtained in the tissue-like counterpart, and gives a glance of a parallelism and the non-evolutionary membrane systems with symport/antiport rules.


Author(s):  
Nico Potyka

Bipolar abstract argumentation frameworks allow modeling decision problems by defining pro and contra arguments and their relationships. In some popular bipolar frameworks, there is an inherent tendency to favor either attack or support relationships. However, for some applications, it seems sensible to treat attack and support equally. Roughly speaking, turning an attack edge into a support edge, should just invert its meaning. We look at a recently introduced bipolar argumentation semantics and two novel alternatives and discuss their semantical and computational properties. Interestingly, the two novel semantics correspond to stable semantics if no support relations are present and maintain the computational complexity of stable semantics in general bipolar frameworks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document