Selection of Intraocular Lenses: Materials, Contraindications, Secondary Implants

Author(s):  
Gerd U. Auffarth
2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
John D. Pitcher ◽  
Mitchell P. Weikert ◽  
Douglas D. Koch

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Fedorovich Pokrovskiy

This review presents the main pros and cons of Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS) versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (DSBCS). The main arguments against ISBCS versus DSBCS are the likelihood of postoperative bilateral endophthalmitis and refractive errors. At the same time, careful selection of patients, the implementation of safety recommendations and the use of intracameral antibiotics, combined with the improvement of formulas for calculating intraocular lenses, provide the advantages of ISBCS associated with the rapid rehabilitation of patients after surgery and economic reasons.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir I Sayegh

Purpose: To show current approaches for overcorrecting astigmatism and "flipping" its axis need be reconsidered in light of methods we introduce that take into account both mismatch and misalignment of the toric intraocular lens (tIOL) with respect to the astigmatism to be corrected at the time of cataract surgery. Setting: Private Practice and Research Center. The EYE Center. Champaign, IL, USA. Design: Formal Analytical Study Methods: In the most common surgical situation where both mismatch and misalignment exist, we present an analysis of the point at which overcorrection and undercorrection residuals coincide, yielding a simple but powerful methodology to predict the optimal degree of overcorrection with a tIOL. The method is illustrated for tIOLs used in surgical practice. Results : The minimum astigmatism appropriate to overcorrect with a tIOL is given by, A_min= m/cos⁡2χ , where m is the midpoint threshold used by "split-the-difference" algorithms and χ is the estimate of tIOL misalignment due to all causes. Correspondingly, the maximum overcorrection, Ω_max, that should be attempted is Ω_max= α/2 [1-γ(2 n-1)] ) where α=σ/τ is the dioptric step at the corneal plane, with σ = H - B, where H = n σ is the cylinder of the overcorrecting tIOL and B = (n - 1)σ is the cylinder of the undercorrecting tIOL, both at the IOL plane, τ is the toricity ratio and γ relates to the angle of misalignment χ by γ = 1/cos⁡2χ - 1 which can be approximated by γ ≈ (χ_deg/40)^2. Ω_max factors elegantly in the product of α/2, the (ideal) midpoint correction for perfect alignment, by the bracketed term, representing the percent reduction of the ideal value in a realistic surgical situation with estimated misalignment χ. To illustrate: an eye of average dimensions (τ ~ 3/2) and tIOLs from major manufacturers (σ = 3/4), with A = 2.35 D dictating n = 5. For a misalignment of 10 degrees Ω_max ≅ 0.10 D is the maximum overcorrection that should be accepted, significantly smaller than the midpoint α/2 = σ/2τ = 0.25 D, recommended by many current tIOL calculators. Conclusion: An optimal method is presented for the selection of an overcorrecting tIOL at the time of refractive cataract surgery with improvement over current tIOL calculators' methods.


2008 ◽  
Vol 364 (1515) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Fahle

Recent research reveals long-lasting cortical plasticity of early sensory cortices even in adults. Sensory signals could be modified under top-down control if necessary quite early in order to optimize their signal-to-noise ratio, leading to ‘low level’ or ‘early’ perceptual learning (PL). For easy tasks, such elaborate top-down influences are usually not required, and learning is restricted to late selection of the appropriate signals on higher cortical levels, which seems easier and faster to achieve. But to reach the absolute limits of sensory performance, PL seems to optimize the entire chain of sensory processing. Hence, improvement for these extreme perceptual abilities is quite specific for a number of stimulus parameters, such as the position in the visual field and sometimes even the trained eye, reflecting the specificity of receptive fields in early sensory cortices. Early PL may be just one example—even if a very extensive one—of the mechanisms of neuronal plasticity and sensomotor flexibility that are constantly updating our sensomotor representations as a result of experience. As an illustration, this review contains some new experimental results on PL and sensory flexibility in the context of adaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses.


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn J. P. Perry ◽  
George N. Papaliodis

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Domenico Iannetti ◽  
Giorgio Vallortigara

Abstract Some of the foundations of Heyes’ radical reasoning seem to be based on a fractional selection of available evidence. Using an ethological perspective, we argue against Heyes’ rapid dismissal of innate cognitive instincts. Heyes’ use of fMRI studies of literacy to claim that culture assembles pieces of mental technology seems an example of incorrect reverse inferences and overlap theories pervasive in cognitive neuroscience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document