Analysis of the Functional Size Measurement Methods Usage by Polish Business Software Systems Providers

Author(s):  
Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot
Author(s):  
BEATA CZARNACKA-CHROBOT

Each rational investment decision, including those made by clients with regard to Business Software Systems (BSS) Development and Enhancement Projects (D&EP), should meet two measurable criteria: effectiveness and economic efficiency. However, in the case of BSS D&EP, the assumption concerning the measurability of these criteria is often treated as controversial. Meanwhile, the so-called concept of BSS D&EP Functional Assessment (FA), proposed by the author and verified in practice, allows for using the potential offered by the Functional Size Measurement (FSM) concept and methods in the area of the quantitative evaluation of these two criteria. Thus, the paper aims at presenting and proving the capabilities of using the functional assessment concept in the quantitative evaluation of BSS D&EP effectiveness and economic efficiency. Linking FSM issues with managerial aspects through the FA concept may contribute to a better understanding of the FSM importance, which is still underestimated by business managers, as in the subject literature this issue is usually considered from a technical perspective. Meanwhile, BSS D&EP FA can constitute the basis for rational decisions not only for BSS providers, but also for BSS clients. These issues classify into economics problems of software engineering research and practice.


2012 ◽  
pp. 1758-1778
Author(s):  
Baris Özkan ◽  
Onur Demirörs

Functional size has been favored as a software size attribute that can be measured early in the software development cycles. Its characteristics of being independent of implementation language, technique and technology promoted the use in software cost estimation and other project management practices. It has been about three decades since Albrecht introduced the concept of functional size and a variety of measurement methods have been developed, some of which have been published by International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Although the concept is recognized in the software community, and there is a growing interest in Functional Size Measurement (FSM), the applications in software organizations have not been common as expected. The problems with FSM method structures and practices have been discussed to be the major factors to explain this situation. This chapter reviews the research papers that propose solutions to the problems with FSM via formalizations in FSM practices or related concept definitions. The associations of the formalization ideas to the abstract software models that represent the view of functionality for FSM methods are of particular interest of the chapter.


Author(s):  
Baris Özkan ◽  
Onur Demirörs

Functional size has been favored as a software size attribute that can be measured early in the software development cycles. Its characteristics of being independent of implementation language, technique and technology promoted the use in software cost estimation and other project management practices. It has been about three decades since Albrecht introduced the concept of functional size and a variety of measurement methods have been developed, some of which have been published by International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Although the concept is recognized in the software community, and there is a growing interest in Functional Size Measurement (FSM), the applications in software organizations have not been common as expected. The problems with FSM method structures and practices have been discussed to be the major factors to explain this situation. This chapter reviews the research papers that propose solutions to the problems with FSM via formalizations in FSM practices or related concept definitions. The associations of the formalization ideas to the abstract software models that represent the view of functionality for FSM methods are of particular interest of the chapter.


2006 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 1341-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Heričko ◽  
Ivan Rozman ◽  
Aleš Živkovič

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document