Further Notations for Elementary System Nets

2013 ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Reisig
Keyword(s):  
1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette Berger

The systems studied are equivalent to indefinite cylinders with rotationally symmetrical potentials. The analytical expressions for the derivatives of the axial potential with respect to z are given for two elementary systems called "Electrode" and "Interval." This analysis is also applied to one further elementary system in which the boundary potential is zero except in one region where its dependence on z follows a second-order polynomial. For a complex real system, the analytical expressions of the derivatives of the axial potential are obtained by superposition of elementary systems. This method renders possible a rapid calculation of the field, even for systems with large electrode separations. Furthermore, it may be used for the design of aberration-corrected systems.[Journal translation]


1939 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
L. Chwistek

I. The present paper contains a formal proof of the following theorem of the elementary system ⊨ [ 1 0 ] c:This theorem means that if there were a theorem of ⊢0 ( 3 2 ) 0 stating that there is no contradiction in ⊢2 ( 5 4 ) 2, we would have a contradiction in ⊢2 ( 5 4 ) 2. (This is in accordance with the second theorem of Gödel.)Our proof is based on the calculus of the system ⊨ [ 1 0 ] c and of the metasystem ⊢0 ( 3 2 ) 0.Note that we could takeinstead of Ax E .1 ( L ) (.1 ( L ) .0 ( L ) L) Z. We would then have to do with the simple systems and metasystems of Hetper, which do not contain propositional variables or the logico-semantical axiom. Our method applies equally to the systems and metasystems of New Foundation and to the simple systems and metasystems of Hetper.Our proof can be considerably simplified by using a recent result of Hetper concerning ancestral functions. Hetper introduces the following abbreviations:If A ( Z1c), B ( x1cy1cZ1c) are propositions, the expression will be called an ancestral function (we prove without difficulty that this expression is a proposition). The expressions will be called respectively the principal term and the term of derivation of this function.


1993 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P. Gazeau ◽  
J. Renaud
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document